Indian hindutvas, their opinion of AfricansAnd how about your atbreastude towards black Africans you f***ing bigot???? These are all your very own words after all, fully recorded in the usenet archives, as a representative of the...
nyknyk
You'll have to prove that buttertion about Windschuttle.
It certainly partook of the general mood of eugenics that
You'll have to prove that buttertion
But that does not make us the Hitler's view was extreme; and we all discount that view don't we?
10 Years Congratulations PM 1292nyknyk Quote: 'These idiots wouldn't know. They're obviously just out of school and cant read' - Ferdie His statement has been proven to be fact...
However, the new book by Keith Windschuttle, The White Australia Policy, finds that these historians fundamentally mistake the Australian character, Australian nationalism and the reasons for the introduction of the White Australia Policy. The formal legislation of the policy was the Immigration Restriction Bill of 1901, which provided a dictation test in a European language as the requirement for immigration. It was preceded by a series of entry taxes on Chinese immigration and a continuing debate over the legitimacy of importing large numbers of Melanesian labourers to work the sugar fields of Queensland. Windschuttle argues that none of this even remotely resembled the racial policies of South Africa and Germany. Windschuttle finds that Australia is not, and never has been, the racist country its academic historians have condemned.
As a propagandist, you are a liar.
What you state is not fair enough. That is definitely not the thrust of Windschuttle's arguement. You are a man of minimilist loyalty to your country, it's history and culture.
He does not have to deny it's existence because in fact it never existed. Unlike your constructions Windschuttle's history is a product of thorough research.
Ask his wife.
