AUSSIE ISLAMIC LEADERS CONDEMN BASHIR COMMENTS 2421

Sean McHugh

eric

aq

Well, dechucka did pose a loaded question of sorts. But what he had implied was quite relevant. The Xtian dogma teaches that one should not kill. Yet throughout history Xtian priest have been blessing troops, canons and warships. At least Islam is somewhat less hyorcitical about the disposal of its enemies!

Why not? I am not aware of any Netiquette rule preventing anyone from doing so. In fact half of all posts (including yours) are based on speculations and wonderings about the world.

True. But that does not earn any input from people!

Yes, it was a loaded question. Also see However what it had implied is the tue state of affairs on the ground in most war zones.

Now that Bashir did not do!

Nor did Bashir do that.

What Bashir did do was trying to offer an explanation to what has happened. You and I are free to disagree with his argument but he does have the right to say what he thinks. Thought crime belongs to the world of 1984 not into the real world.

Irrelevant. At least Bashir is out in the open where everyone can see what he thinks and what he does. That is where he should stay and not disappear into the personic underground.

I don't think that dechucka nor anyone else here had supported Bashir in anything he said or actually did. So your outrage is superfluous.

Now why would dechucka or any sane person do that? But we would also not start chanting around "Ave Maria" or some such supersbreastious nonsense...

Try to seriously explain why that might be so! You might come up with some quite interesting theories. That aside, those persons and Bashir are not everyone's heroes. Certainly not in Bali.

Hmmmm. You buttume (and quite without any substance) that someone here has supported them.

Apparently your best is just not good enough.

For the time being you are only using the far right extremes of your brain.

=D6rd=F6g Either the neocons go or civilisation does!