No, there is a huge, huge difference. Einsteinian physics is based upon a huge bungle. It is a lot of brilliant lies, packaged in high-sounding mumbo-jumbo, as a consequence.
I have developed Newtonian physics, by discovering a formula for unlimited energy, and that approach explains many natural events like the energy from the sun, and energy from atom plants. So, e=mcc is not only bunkum, it is irrelevant - and the sooner the public thinks so, the better.
All engineering that makes money and supports the economy is based upon Newtonian physics. Yes, it had its limitations, but I have overcome them to a large extent with my new approaches in physics that once understood will open a incredible range of possibilities.
The whole Eisteinian paradigm is proven wrong beyond doubt; and so, it will never be satisfactory! Einstein is totally wrong, and he gives a ridiculously wrong perception of the universe. (What relativistic effects are, are due to the fact that light always moves a longer or shorter path that what is measured, as a result of movement of the body. This is a very new idea, and I have shown how this explains the null results in the Michelson-Morley Interferometry experiment.) Einsteinism (meaning giving precedence to appearance over reality, to fiction over fact, to lies over truth) will always naturally lead to more lies and confusion, though it will be profitable to a few. I have given my ideas in detail over the last few years, and they are freely available in Usenet. See for instance, my paper "Discussions on Relativity" publised in sci.physics and see my follow-ups to polite criticsims. I am sure that all intelligent minds can understand my ideas - however, such minds are few in number as a percentage of the population, and so, it will take anything from 10-300 years for my ideas to get accepted, the way things are going! Still, one wonderfully successful experiment from me, will settle matters beyond dispute.
I do not agree. Nothing good can come from bullpoo. Look at the fate of fusion research. If Einstein was right, that the sun is a huge hydrogen plant and we can get unlimited energy from seawater, then we should have had fusion energy twenty years ago! Instead, we are told we may have it by 2020! Along with "another" moon landing! :) :) Bullpoo has its uses, and that is, to enrich those who practise it at the expense of the vast number of the media-gulled worshippers of the Emperor's New Clothes.
On the other hand, look at the wonderful, wonderful field of electronics and computers, that is so successful as unlike energy it has *nothing* to do with the bullpoo theories of Einstein. There has been so much incredible development, with super fast computers, broadband, and so on. Humanity is so much enhanced with non-Einsteinian thinking.
America at its best 3891
Rifty Ho-ho. They just offer blind rejection. They do not show any understanding at all of what...
The only reason for Einstein's hold is his formula for energy, and that has given atom plants and hydrogen plants, making some countries very powerful and rich. But that formula is wrong - the energy from atom plants can be shown to happen without destruction of matter, from my formula, that is far more correct, intuitive and predictive.
America at its best 3888
Simply a statement of fact, I don't have the time to read through volumes of Indian mythology, some of us work for a living. Ahhhhh, the myopic ivory tower view of the...
America at its best 3890
Rifty I've noticed the instant reactionary responses, but the funny thing is he can actually be quite civil. In this thread for instance the tone...
If I am allowed a bit more than zero funding and less interest from the public, or some worthy member of the public, then we may have space travel to the stars, energy without pollution, healthy social and family life, and a much better world.
Well, let me at least hope for the best! Who knows, what may happen tomorrow?
Thank you for your politeness. That is rather unusual!