Are we deceived by multiculturalism 330

You really think "Aielyn" is my real name? As it happens, I chose the pseudonym "Aielyn" because it sounds elvish to me (I'm a fan of Tolkien).

Feel free to laugh. I really don't care what you think of me.

The issue (ie topic) exists, but the problem doesn't. Monoculturalists believe there is a problem because they lack the cognitive ability to understand the word "Multiculturalism", and what it encompbuttes.

You said "discussing the issues", not "commenting on the article". Do you have nothing of your own to contribute to the discussion? Are you really so incapable of forming your own opinion that you cannot comment on the topic in your own words? Do you really think people care that you simply agree with the article?

Let's see what you said:

"A childish attempt to deflect attention away from this ever-increasingly important issue.

Gawd, Would you like to pbutt comment on the thrust of the issue instead of being jsut a bore? " No comment on the issue.

"Gawd

Yeah, way too subtle as well as stupid.

You pbutted comment on one sentence - of course the rest is either too complicated for you or challenges your position on the issue, which is BTW, 'multiculturalism'.

How come supporters of multiculturalism can't, or won;'t argue the topic?" No comment on the issue. Note that I responded to the question you asked. Also note that you believed Tokyo Rose AKA Gawd was a multiculturalist.

"Gawd,

Now that we have cleared up just who the stupid f***wit is how about we get back to the article and comment on it.

I thought it to be a fairly clear indication of the facts and the direction we are heading .

Don't comment on my comment, give us yours. And, as no doubt it will be at odds with the article, you might like to give us a clue why you think it to be inaccurate." No substantive comment, just a generic agreement with the article - how is this contributing to the discussion?

It just goes downhill from here - you didn't discuss the issue at all after that, despite a large number of posts within the thread.

What did I say on the issue? I wrote extensively on the difference between multiculturalism and what monoculturalists think it is. I wrote in detail on why I believe monoculturalism leads to a weaker country while multiculturalism leads to a stronger one. I noted that the article posted by ferdie the one-line-wonder-cut-and-paster was plagiarised, originally written by Pastor Danny Nalliah (ferdie didn't attribute it to him). I observed the similarity between the monoculturalists and religious extremists (a valid comparison - both want monocultures, and both will do whatever they can to get it).

This isn't a case of the pot calling the kettle black, it's a case of the pot calling the toaster black.