Gawd
I don't get it - why are you "attacking" me? I'm guessing that you are also a monoculturalist, and find what I said offensive - it would explain your immediate jump to personal attack. Seems to be a common response among idiots. (from here on, I'm buttuming that you are an offended monoculturalist)
It is ironic that you suggest that I am paranoid, when it is the bigoted monoculturalists that show paranoia when they make it seem that all non-(their cultural group) is out to get them, and must be removed from the country at once. Multiculturalists aim for, as the government use in their literature, "Unity in diversity". The reason is that a monoculture grows hard and weak because it lacks diversity - the same is observed in many other situations - conformity leads to weakness (a hard substance is liable to break, while a strong substance bends and flexes to maintain consistency). Meanwhile, multicultures get stronger as they grow more diverse - they become strong and flexible, rather than weak and hard.
I note that, unlike the monoculturalists on the NG (aus.politics), the multiculturalists have actually discussed the issues brought up in the Pastor's article (which ferdie plagiarised). Multiculturalists have independent views, views which have room to adjust to the situation. Monoculturalists, on the other hand, have a collective view, and are incapable of rational debate.
I await a rational, intelligent response.
