The author is speaking the truth. The longer stupid liberals ignore Islamofacism , the way they ignored communism in the 30s , the more certain it is that we will lose our freedoms to the soon to be Islamic majority due to a very high birth rate. Why should our women have to cover up in an Islamic area of free countries ?
excerpt
But culture and religion are behavioural. They involve values.
People can be born into a particular culture or religion but sooner or later they reach an age of reason where they can embrace or reject their precepts. And if people freely embrace a culture that is anbreasthetical to the prevailing social mores -- in our case, I would hope, liberal, enlightenment values -- then we are enbreastled to judge, object, censure and even discriminate.
Which brings us to this extremely needlely issue of radical Islam.
My colleague on this paper, Nadia Jamal, has mounted a strong and sophisticated argument that the issue is not religion but culture, specifically the patriarchal culture that prevails in many traditional Muslim households. This is a good point but I think it diplomatically sidesteps the fact that some strains of Islam -- most obviously the strict, puritanical and downright fanatical Wahhabism -- do, indeed, sanction atbreastudes and behaviour that are not simply patriarchal but repressive. I'm sorry, but to this extent, this particular brand of Islam is most definitely the problem.
When groups of young Muslim men stalk the beaches of Sydney making loveually threatening comments against women in bathing costumes, as they indisputably do; and when they believe they act with the license of a sheik who claims that such women are responsible for their own loveual violation, then I do blame, in part, their religion.
The Panic Over IraqWhich holy book is really from the True Allah: The Quran or The Bible??? How to verify the truth of these holy books? Suggestions: 1- For Truthfulness...
I do not embrace multiculturalism, as such, because I do not believe all cultures are compatible with non-discriminatory liberalism. I prefer a multi-ethnic, non-racial society, which has at its core a canon of values that include racial and gender equality.
I admit to feeling a little uneasy at the sight of a Muslim woman shrouded not simply in a headscarf but a face-concealing, head-to-toe chador, and wonder just how much choice she has had in deciding her lifestyle. I am not hugely sympathetic to a Muslim seeking asylum because he claims to have been discriminated against because of his support for sharia law.
I'm sorry but I cannot celebrate such culture in the way that I celebrate Italian National Day in Leichhardt or the Tet festival in Cabramatta or Greek Orthodox Easter or a Seder at Pbuttover or a service of Eritrean Orthodox Church, such as the one I attended a couple of years ago in a borrowed Church of England in London, or lunch with a couple of Palestinian intellectuals.
Some multicultural theorists will squawk and say that I prefer only a soft multiculturalism (if they insist on calling it that) that does not offend western liberal values. They would be spot on. My acceptance ends when the buttault on the liberality of society itself begins.
Howards AnthemAustralian whites let us rejoice, For we are racist and free; We've golden soil and...
None of this erases the points I made yesterday, condemning the lynch-mob mentality of the Cronulla crowds, boozed up, in their thousands, chasing down lone Lebanese teenagers.
But I do accept the need for a debate about cultural, rather than ethnic, compatibility -- because the two are not the same.
LATEST COMMENTSPuritanical and strict forms of Islam the problem?
Does anyone honestly believe that these young men are going to the beaches on 'bikini watch', looking to reprimand women on how they are dressed, after having listened to a sermon at the local mosque.