carefully and wrote
Thank you. English is my second language and I do have to struggle to use English correctly, though it does not prevent me to communicate both in my work and my life. If you can correct my English, it is very nice. To practice my English is one of the purposes I post in these news groups. I am always ready to learn. I believe I should say "I enjoy to provide ..." Sometimes I think Chinese sentence first than translate it to English and ...
I answered you above request, now I re-quote: " You are totally wrong. I am glad that you post on SCC. It is good to let more people including Chinese and Americans to see the FACTS. After reading the posts, netters will know who is IGNORANT, who only has some ideology like Bin Laden but has no evidence to support his-her points, and who is speaking based on the ACTS. That is a good education for all the Chinese and American readers. That is why I cross post to soc.culture.usa and welcome you to post on SCC. "
What I have not done? Ask you above question? Why do not you directly ANSWER above question with evidence, i.e. "Who acknowledged that (Tibet was independent)?"? Labeling and name calling will not help you in your debate. These techniques only show you are out of the argument. As EXPECTED and as most of China basher on SCC, you will start to use these techniques sooner or later. I provided examples like the USA statement in 1947, ROC claim, India prime minister statement in 1950s, the China history map used in USA University. I do not think USA, India, ROC "regurgitate the Chinese Communist Party line" as you claimed. In FACT, all of them fought bloody war with CCP. You are just too IGNORANT to know.
You know that I am right, that is why you delete those FACTS and start to use your last but most important weapon, i.e. labeling and name calling.
If you cannot read I can re-quote my statements. PLEASE, do not delete them before you accept these FACTS. I use FACTS to support my points. And you? Labeling, name calling, opinions only without evidence? You will be the judge.
It is YOU who are responsible to use FACTS to support YOUR allegation of you or you quote, i.e. "who acknowledge the independence of Tibet". So far YOU FAILED to do that.
Here are FACTS I provided to you:
1) Qing, ROC, PRC NEVER acknowledge the independence of Tibet. ROC of cause claim Tibet as part of China. ROC map contained not only the Tibet but also the Mongolia. The current Dalai was approved by the China central government, i.e. ROC government.
2) Reference show in 1947, USA acknowledged Tibet as part of China 'Froeign Relation of US Vol VII 1947 ...."Great Britain has long manifested a special interest in Tibet, and has exercised a considerable political influence there. As the U.S. and China both regard Tibet as an integral part of China, British attempts to prevent the exercise of Chinese sovereignty over that area or to change its political status would consbreastute a source of friction in Sino-British relations and could not fail to be of concern to the U.S."'
3) India acknowledged Tibet as part of China in last several hundreds years
'In 1954 Indian Prime Minister Jawaharlal Nehru said, "Over the past several hundred years, as far as I know, at no time has any foreign country denied China's sovereignty over Tibet." '
2) and 3) you could refer Yu's post on thread 'Did China oppress the Tibetan people or free the Tibetan'
4) The Map of China history in USA University shows that Tibet has been part of China at least since Qing.
PLEASE, PLEASE, do not call ROC, USA, Nehru as 'regurgitate the Chinese Communist Party line' and 'butt'. As I said, in FACT, ALL of them fought wars with Chinese Communist Party. May be due to your IGNORANCE, you do not know. If you know, you just wrote whatever you want but ignore the FACTS, what can I say? In fact, FACTS are not that scary as you think, though they often do not fit your agenda and your ideology.
Have a nice weekend!
Dazuixia
