of best
None of the wester countries became strong and propserous under the model of democracy you are propagating.
USA itself is a good example. USA became propserous bacause the european immigrants robbed the land and all resources from the natives, not because of democracy. Women in USA were not allowed to vote untill after 1920, when the US consbreastution was ammended.
Non-white were not considered to be smart enough to decide on the right candidate to vote till August 1965.
Present form of democracy only started fo take shape after Voting Rights Act of 1965.
European countries mainly became prosperous tthough exploitation of cheap manpower and resources from their colonies. They did not become peopserous as a result of democracy.
Japan too became strong and prosprous under absolute monarchy system, not democrtic system.
India, the world most populous democracy, has been struggling for more than half a century! It is still in bas shape after more than half a century.
The all mighty USSR became a severely ill when it embarced western style democracy. The country fell apart. Life expectancy became shorter. Per capital income became halved.
So, what is so great about western syyled democracy?
You mean Chechnya was part of Russia all the while? Read your history. When Chechnya started, it had nothing to do with terrorism. The people voted to be out of Russia. Moscow responded with their troops. What did you and all those whocondemn China so much over Tibet do?
See above.
