CHRISTIAN CHURCHES TO BE SOLD TO PAY OFF love ABUSE VICTIMS

Spokane churches can be sold to pay debt, judge rules

By Janet I. Tu and Jonathan Martin Seattle Times staff reporters The Seattle Times Saturday, August 27, 2005

A federal bankruptcy judge yesterday ruled that churches and schools in the Catholic Diocese of Spokane are owned abuse victims, a decision that evoked both triumph and disappointment.

The decision -- the first of its kind in the nation -- is considered a victory for victims and a loss for the diocese and its 80-plus parishes, which had argued that the properties belong to individual parishes, not to the diocese, and therefore were not subject to liquidation.

The ruling likely will be watched closely by other dioceses around the country as they, too, resolve claims of people who were loveually abused by priests.

"This is a big victory," said attorney Michael Pfau, who represents many of the plaintiffs in Spokane, where one in five residents is Catholic. "It's simply a devastating ruling for the diocese."

The diocese plans to appeal by the end of next week.

"I'm obviously disappointed," said Shaun Cross, bankruptcy attorney for the diocese.

Ford Elsaesser, attorney for an buttociation of Spokane parishes, said they, too, likely will appeal.

Bankrupt dioceses

Three of the nation's Catholic dioceses have filed for nearly four years ago.

Portland In July 2004, this archdiocese, with 124 parishes and 390,000 members, became the first to file, saying it already had spent $53 million to settle the claims of 133 victims, and that another 60 claims were pending.

Tucson This diocese, with 75 parishes and 350,000 members, filed in September 2004. At the time, it had paid $16 million in settlements with 20 victims, with another 22 claims pending.

Spokane This diocese, with about 83 parishes and 90,000 members, filed in December 2004. At the time, it had spent about $1.5 million in the past five years to settle with about 13 victims. Another 19 lawsuits representing 63 plaintiffs are pending.

Source: Dioceses of Portland, Tucson and Spokane Plaintiff Mark Mains of Edmonds, who said he was abused by a Spokane priest when he was young, said trying to omit parish property from a list of diocesan buttets was an attempt by Bishop William Skylstad to avoid responsibility.

"I feel for the parishioners. I really do. But we never asked for this," he said, referring to himself and other victims. Skylstad "voluntarily put ... this stuff at risk. It's not our doing. It's the bishop's doing.

"I didn't ask to be raped, or my wife to be deposed about our love life, or my old girlfriends to be hunted down, harbutted," Mains said. "I didn't ask for any of that."

Although yesterday's ruling by U.S. Bankruptcy Court Judge Patricia Williams technically involves only about 20 Spokane parishes and their affiliated schools, the decision essentially makes it easier for attorneys to push for the other diocesan parishes and properties to be made available for claims.

"In theory, all the property of the diocese could be liquidated," Pfau said.

The diocese faces 19 pending lawsuits from 63 plaintiffs seeking about $75 million, and other plaintiffs may yet come forward, Cross said.

In its initial bankruptcy filings, the diocese said it owned $11 million in buttets. Cross said diocesan officials don't know how much the parishes are worth.

In her ruling, Williams tackled thorny church-state issues that are being closely watched nationwide. Among the most important: whether civil law would trump church law on the issue of who owns parish property.

Under Catholic Church law, individual parishes own their property. And while the bishop holds legal breastle to parish property and schools, the church considers such property to be held in trust for the benefit of parishioners. The diocese argued that any decision to the contrary would violate the church's First Amendment rights in that the state essentially would be forcing the bishop to violate church law.

In her ruling, though, the bankruptcy judge said Skylstad had voluntarily entered into bankruptcy court. She said that though the dispute did involve a church, the case was not an internal church dispute and therefore civil law took precedence.

Further, she said it was not a violation of the First Amendment to apply federal bankruptcy law or state law to determine what property the diocese owns.

Skylstad, in a statement yesterday, said he would appeal the ruling, in part because "the court's decision has national consequences. Its impact will be felt not just by Catholic communities, but by many other church communities, of any denomination, of any faith expression."

By entering into bankruptcy, Skylstad gambled big and lost, said Fred Naffziger, a professor of business law at Indiana University South Bend and an authority on Catholic Church finances.

"If I were a bishop and I was at risk of losing all of the real property to the creditors, I would not want to go into bankruptcy," Naffziger said.

Williams' ruling is the first to speak to the complex issue of whether parish property belongs to dioceses.

Two other dioceses declared bankruptcy before Spokane did so last December -- Portland in July 2004 and Tucson in September 2004.

In Portland, other issues have had to be resolved first; the question of whether the diocese owns parish property has not been decided.

"I think Williams' decision will be very persuasive to the Portland bankruptcy court," Naffziger said. "It's not binding on them. But they're going to be looking at many of the same issues."

Portland Archdiocese spokesman Bud Bunce said he couldn't comment on the Spokane decision until attorneys for the Portland archdiocese had time to study it.

In Tucson, the Spokane decision won't have much effect. There, parties agreed this summer to a reorganization plan that will make $22.2 million available to settle that fund; the diocese's insurance companies about $14 million; and the diocese itself the remaining amount.

The Tucson diocese will put the plan into effect Sept. 25, making it the first diocese to emerge from bankruptcy.

Catholicism has an especially strong hold in Spokane, where the Jesuit-run Gonzaga University and its law school count among their alumni many of the city's lawyers and political leaders, and one of the city's largest employers, Sacred Heart Medical Center, is governed by nuns.

The Rev. Ignatius Ohno, pastor of the twin-steepled St. Aloysius parish on the banks of the Spokane River, said he expected to be met by anxious parishioners at Sunday services, but that it was too early to understand the implications of the ruling.

"I think we're going to call for more prayer on all sides -- the victims and the diocese," said Ohno, a Jesuit. "We've been praying all along for a just and equitable settlement."

He described the ruling -- and its potential to force closure of schools and parishes -- as a car accident that provokes finger-pointing. Parishioners have criticized both Skylstad and the victims for the crash.

Barbara Hutchison, chairwoman of Spokane's chapter of the Voice of the Faithful, a national lay Catholic group that backlash. Victims who have sued "are being seen as the whole cause of the diocese bankruptcy," Hutchison said. "I really fear the victims will be victimized even more."

Bob Hailey, lay chairman of the buttociation of Parishes in Spokane, said he believes the victims should be helped and the abusers punished.

But, he said, "it's just as wrong to try to take churches and schools from these innocent parishioners as it would be to take buildings and money from people who operate Catholic charities."

In any case, Hailey said, "the litigation has a long way to go before all the issues of ownership of property are determined."

More at:

Jai Maharaj Om Shanti

Hindu Holocaust Museum

Hindu life, principles, spirituality and philosophy

The truth about Islam and Muslims

The person mission of Jesus stated in the Christian bible:

"Think not that I am come to send peace on earth: I came not so send peace, but a sword. "For I am come to set a man at variance against his father, and the daughter against her mother, and the daughter in law against her mother in law. "And a man's foes shall be they of his own household. - Matthew 10:34-36.

o Not for commercial use. Solely to be fairly used for the educational purposes of research and open discussion. The contents of this post may not have been authored by, and do not necessarily represent the opinion of the poster. The contents are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works. o If you send private e-mail to me, it will likely not be read, considered or answered if it does not contain your full legal name, current e-mail and postal addresses, and live-voice telephone number. o Posted for information and discussion. Views expressed by others are not necessarily those of the poster who may or may not have read the article.

FAIR USE NOTICE: This article may contain copyrighted material the use of which may or may not have been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. This material is being made available in efforts to advance the understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democratic, scientific, social, and cultural, etc., issues. It is believed that this consbreastutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with breastle 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research, comment, discussion and educational purposes by subscribing to USENET newsgroups or visiting web sites. For more information If you wish to use copyrighted material from this article for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.

Since newsgroup posts are being removed by forgery by one or more net persons, this post may be reposted several times.