DELEGATE'S SHIFT BAFFLES CHRISTIAN CHURCH'S love CRIME VICTIMS

Delegate's shift baffles victims of church abuse

By Jon Ward The Washington Times Friday, March 31, 2006

love abuse victims in Maryland thought they had Delegate Anthony Brown on their side in a push for a law allowing retroactive civil suits against the Catholic Church.

That was until Mr. Brown was summoned to see Cardinal Theodore E. McCarrick.

After his meeting with the archbishop of Washington, Mr. Brown, a Prince George's County Democrat and running mate to gubernatorial candidate Martin O'Malley, changed his position to oppose the legislation.

Mr. Brown, a practicing Catholic, said the visit was "a social call."

But abuse victims say Mr. Brown "grilled" Catholic Church officials and attorneys at a March 9 hearing.

"He was asking very pointed questions about what they were doing, and he did not seem satisfied that they were helping the victims," said David Lorenz, 47, of Bowie, who said he was abused when he was 11 in Kentucky.

"It seemed like he was all into protecting us," said James Bucci Jr., 44, of California, Md., who said he was abused by two priests, and eventually raped by one of them, from 1968 plus 1 to 1977.

Mr. Brown met with Cardinal McCarrick days after the hearing.

The bill would have extended the statute of limitations for civil lawsuits so anyone who claims they were abused could sue until they were 43 years old.

Last weekend, the House Judiciary Committee, on which Mr. Brown sits, amended the bill to exclude anyone who is currently over 25 years old. The bill has advanced to a Senate committee for consideration.

The change angered adult victims such as Mr. Bucci and Mr. Lorenz, who have lobbied lawmakers and who testified about their abuse in front of a packed hearing room.

"I sent a letter to Brown asking why the cardinal gets a private hearing, when everybody else has to share publicly," Mr. Lorenz said.

"He gave a bunch of people a lot of hope. A lot of people were really depressed when they found out what he did, that he not only turned coat but actively lobbied against the bill," said Peter Gillon, a lawyer with Greenberg Traurig LLP in the District, which is ready to file suits on behalf of about 20 abuse victims.

Mr. Brown, 45, said he was asked to be a "champion" of the bill by abuse victims lobbying in Annapolis.

"I said to them, let me hear from both parties, both sides, all sides, and then I will let you know what role I will play. After the bill hearing, I told them, 'I cannot be your champion on this bill,' " Mr. Brown said..

"That was unfortunately interpreted as, 'He no longer supports the survivors,' " Mr. Brown said.

Bishop William S. Skystad, president of the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops, was asked yesterday at a press conference about the Washington archdiocese's efforts to kill the bill. The bishop sidestepped the question, describing such legislation as "ways to collect damages," adding, "Bishops in general have tried to uphold statutes of limitation."

o Julia Duin contributed to this report.

More at:

Jai Maharaj Om Shanti

Hindu Holocaust Museum

Hindu life, principles, spirituality and philosophy

The truth about Islam and Muslims

o Not for commercial use. Solely to be fairly used for the educational purposes of research and open discussion. The contents of this post may not have been authored by, and do not necessarily represent the opinion of the poster. The contents are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works. o If you send private e-mail to me, it will likely not be read, considered or answered if it does not contain your full legal name, current e-mail and postal addresses, and live-voice telephone number. o Posted for information and discussion. Views expressed by others are not necessarily those of the poster who may or may not have read the article.

FAIR USE NOTICE: This article may contain copyrighted material the use of which may or may not have been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. This material is being made available in efforts to advance the understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democratic, scientific, social, and cultural, etc., issues. It is believed that this consbreastutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with breastle 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research, comment, discussion and educational purposes by subscribing to USENET newsgroups or visiting web sites. For more information If you wish to use copyrighted material from this article for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.