DO JEWSZIONISTSISRAEL KNOW WHAT HONEST INTEGRITY DEMOCRACY FREEDOM ALL REALLY MEAN 1928


Your Ad Here

Your Ad Here

TALKING ABOUT MEL ÁV SO THE STORY OF THE INQUISITION IS ANTI CATHOLICISM. TALKING ABOUT COLONIALISM, IS ANTI BRITISH. TALKING ABOUT THE MbuttACRES OF INDIANS IN AMERICA IS ANTI AMERICAN.

DISCUSSION OF THE MbuttACRES OF ABORIGNES IN AUSTRALIA IS ANTI WHITE AUSTRALIAN.

THE JEWS ARE TRYING TO CLOSE DOWN HISTORY ABOUT THEM BECAUSE THEY HAVE A LOT TO FEAR.

HAVE A CLOSE LOOK AT THE SUPPOSED ANTI SEMITISM AND POGRAMS. THEIR COMPLAINTS ABOUT BEING FORCED TO LEAVE A COUNTRY.

ALL THEIR COMPLAINTS DO NOT WANT ANYONE TO OBSERVE THE SIMPLE FACT THAT MOST OF IT WAS SIMPLY BEING CAUGHT BECAUSE OF PROVOCATION BY USING THEIR POSITION AND INFLUENCE AS TODAY AND AS IN PREWAR GERMANY.

AND AS THEN THEY NOW ALIGN THEMSELVES WITH THE RICH SO THAT THEY ARE UNTOUCHABLE.

AND THEY HAVE THE POWER THEY WANT TO MANIPULATE THE COUNTRY TO WHATEVER STANCE SUITS THEM.

Israel was founded on probably the greatest lie and scam in the world. AUSCHWITZ CROSSES AT AUSCHWITZ

Historian--Jews consistently call for the removal of Christian symbols from Auschwitz even though statistics at Auschwitz demonstrate that at least 80% of the labor at that work camp were non-Jews--e.g., Christians and Moslems--yet the Jews are only interested in Jewish-oriented rests and not in the others. Very few persons who survived Auschwitz discuss the gbutting of Jews or others there, except for the Jews who were interrogated for the Nuremberg Show Trial in 1947. In addition, the Red Cross

The Zionist attack on Christianity in Jerusalem: AS ALWAYS EVEN NOW THE JEWS ELECT TO SPEAK FOR ALL AMERICANS? NON JEWS DO NOT APPEAR TO HAVE A VOICE?

WARNING To People in Austria; Belgium; France; Germany; Israel; Spain and Switzerland. You can be fined,imprisoned or both for discussing the topics set forth in this article.

Israeli stats

Jews and Palestinians genetically similar.

War without end

Israeli stats Yes and you have no quarrel with the US? They dont have to, they use their army to shoot, run over and mistreat physically and loveually helpless children. What can a Palestinian do when the mighty money contributing yanks cannot protect their citizens.

One guy gets 10 years, the other gets a raise and promotion??

htm American and Australian shot by Israelis Chris McGreal talks to the relatives of three British and American victims

Marlon Brando.

m ADL OUTRAGED BY MARLON BRANDO'S REMARKS ON JEWS To declare that the end justifies the means, to declare that the government may commit crimes, would bring terrible retribution. Louis D. Brandeis

Christian homes being knocked down??? The new homes were built by a group of limited income Palestinian Christian families who banded together as the Arab Orthodox Housing Project to build a new life. They obtained a 99-year lease from their Church, the Greek Orthodox Church, 22 years ago and then began the agonizing process of organizing and saving enough money to start construction.

"We were renters for 40 years," Dalal Awad, a mother of five told me. "We saved for 22 years and built this home with our neighbors. It cost $42,000. We built it with our hearts, our own labor. Now the Israelis want to kill our dream."

Making antiSemitic remarks in a movie land controlled by powerful Jews" 1933
Whoa!!! Hold up here. All of you folks on both sides are whack jobs, and hate mongers. There is way to much heat here, and no light...

(Wanderer, Oct. 12, 1989, p. 7; National Review, March 16, 1992, p. S-5).

Israeli soldiers can beat up a priest on the West Bank, then shoot up his church during Mbutt, and only the Catholic press takes note...If Christians had done such a thing to a synagogue, anywhere, it would have been front-page news, everywhere. (Wanderer, Oct. 12, 1989, p. 7; National Review, March 16, 1992, p. S-5).

Farmers harbutted and shot in israel

"During the last three decades Jews in the United States have made up 50 percent of the top two hundred intellectuals ... 20 percent of professors at the leading universities ... 40 percent of partners in the leading law firms in New York and Washington ... 59 percent of the directors, writers and producers of the 50 top-grossing motion pictures from 1965 to 1982, and 58 percent of directors, writers and producers in two or more primetime television series."

Making antiSemitic remarks in a movie land controlled by powerful Jews" 1934
On Sat, 12 Aug 2006 10:21:04 -0400, in Then you must remember this. Updated to March 14, 2003 The anono-coward trashboy "Seneca" claims not to be antisemitic. Readers are...

Zionist settler deliberately hits and kills Palestinian old man

c378ab?q=&rnum=1 empire of dirt ... life around the world has only earned us the ... "A million African-Americans were disenfranchised in the last ... history with Jews and fences. There was a judge from France ...

y+One+Million+Jews+Died+In+World&o=10

Ugly war over West Bank olive crop By James Shaw BBC, Jerusalem

Sometimes the settlers throw stones at the farmers. Sometimes they set dogs on them. A few days ago, a villager was shot dead.

HOW TO KEEP ACADEMICS QUIET The Real Issue Is Israel's Human Rights Record: A statement by Norman G. Finkelstein upon publication of Beyond Chutzpah

Professor Alan Dershowitz of Harvard University is currently best known for his advocacy of the "most excruciating" torture against person suspects such as a "needle being shoved under the fingernails." The alleged purpose of this torture is to extract a truthful confession but its real consequence, as human rights organizations have pointed out, is to produce whatever statements are necessary to end the suffering.

OF COURSE IF WE ALLOW THESE BARBARIC VIEWS TO DOMINATE UNDER THE DOCTRINE WHICH APPEARS TO BE IT'S BETTER TO BE JEWISH THAN GIFTED??

ONE OF THE ACADEMICS ON A CUSHY POSSIBLY FRIENDS SUPPORTED APPOINTMENT LECTURING STUDENTS.OF COURSE OPPRESSION IS THE NEXT BARBARIC OLD METHODOLOGY.

For 15 months Dershowitz has applied a variant of this truth-seeking technique -- less physically painful but no less excruciating -- to prospective publishers of Beyond Chutzpah, which offers a critical examination of Israel's human rights record and Dershowitz's defense of it. Enlisting one of the most powerful law firms in the country after his personal initiatives proved unsuccessful, Dershowitz has repeatedly threatened to bankrupt highly respected publishers with litigation if they didn't cancel publication of my book. He could then proclaim that the cancellation confirmed the "truth" that Beyond Chutzpah didn't meet scholarly standards.

Dershowitz justified these blackmail tactics on the ground that Beyond Chutzpah libels him. Yet, when I first began to expose his gross scholarly misconduct, Dershowitz publicly declared at UCLA (on 21 October 2003) that he wouldn't respond with a libel action because he believed "so strongly in the First Amendment and full freedom of speech." Ironically, just as he was threatening my publishers with expensive and time-consuming lawsuits, Dershowitz denounced Holocaust denier David Irving, who had sued Deborah Lipstadt for libel, with these words: "Before Irving lost his case against Lipstadt, several publishers had refused to issue books critical of Irving, out of fear of his bringing expensive and time-consuming lawsuits. That was a chilling of free speech" (Afterword to Lipstadt's History on Trial; his emphasis).

My publisher, University of California Press, was understandably at great pains to fend off a potential lawsuit by Dershowitz; for an academic publisher the buttociated costs would have been ruinous, to the point of making certain victory meaningless. On occasion our relationship became strained and at one point it appeared as if we had reached an impbutte. However, through the skillful mediation of Nation magazine senior editor Roane Carey (who was the freelance editor of Beyond Chutzpah) and others, a satisfactory compromise was reached that protected the interests of both publisher and author, and, most importantly, preserved the integrity of the book. I would like personally to extend my heartfelt thanks to all who supported me and the press during this difficult period. In case you missed it. "MISUSING ANTI-SEMITISM, ABUSING HISTORY" by Professor Norman G. Finkelstein, De Paul University, Chicago. Dr. Norman Finkelstein is speaking at McGill University next Tuesday, November 8th, 2005.

The Israel Lobby John Mearsheimer and Stephen Walt

Wakeup America. The media is driving us headlong into war based on lies and misconceptions. Iran has the largest jewish population of any muslim country. Iran also has four Jewish members of Parliament who are appointed by the Jewish community! Iranian jews are deeply opposed to the Zionist state!

In the beginning That in 1880 the total Jewish population in Palestine was about 24,000 all of whom were living in safety, and with dignity - this was at a time when Jews were being persecuted, tortured and end in Europe and Russia;

In the Beginning In the beginning In 1880 Jews were ONLY 5.3% of the total population of Palestine (and had been this percentage of the population (or less) for more than a thousand years). In 1946 the Jewish population was almost entirely comprised of recent immigrants (people who had been in the country less than twenty years).

THE BRUTAL NAZI APARTHEID REGIME OF ISRAEL Israel Judge Promotes Her Court As a Model

Strike Breaking STRIKE BREAKING (AS REPORTED BY NYT AND OTHER AMERICAN PAPERS) THE JERUSALEM POST CORRESPONDENT HIRSH GOODMAN ÁV they have not received any person training, nor are they members of a person organization. Rather they are members of that Palestinian generation that grew up knowing nothing but occupation

With anger, hatred, and sheer ferocity, thousands of youngsters hurled rocks at their Israeli occupiers, undaunted by the gunfire that greeted them. This was more than civil unrest. ...It was the beginning of a civil rebellion - Dan Fisher, Los Angeles Times, December 20, 1987. On that day, - wrote John Kifner in The New York Times, - the vast army of Arab laborers who wait on tables, pick vegetables, haul garbage, lay brick and perform virtually all Israel's menial work, stayed home.: John Kifner, New York Times, December 22, 1987.

The Israeli response to the uprising was brutal. Defense Minister Yitzhak Rabin ordered the use of tanks, armored vehicles and automatic rifles against an unarmed population.

The San Francisco Examiner cited Rabin as openly advocating buttbuttination. "They can shoot to hit leaders of disorder," Rabin said in defense of the army's practice of using marksmen with high-powered .22-caliber rifles to shoot indiscriminately at Palestinian youth. - San Francisco Examiner, December 23, 1987.

Rabin ordered house-to-house searches, first for young men and later for anyone of whom an example might be made. By December 27, over 2,500 Palestinians were seized, many of them as young as twelve; by the end of January the number reached 4,000 and was rising. The "militants "were marked for deportation. Israeli high-security jails and detention centers were overflowing. Mbutt trials of Palestinians were underway.

The act of brutality which most inflamed the Palestinian population was the army seizure of the wounded from hospital beds. This practice, standard procedure throughout the invasion of Lebanon in 1982, made Shifa Hospital in Gaza a center of resistance. Great crowds ambutted to defend the wounded, whom, they rightfully feared, would never be seen again.

A mother of a Palestinian man shot three times in the head by Israeli soldiers was asked if she would let her remaining sons join the demonstrations. " As long as I am alive, "she responded, "I am going to teach the young people to fight ... I don't care whatever happens, as long as we get our land." - John Kifner, New York Times, December 21, 1987.

"They entered the house like animals, shouting," the 22-year old student at Bir Zeit University said. "They took us from the house, kicking us in the head, beating us, all the soldiers with their rifle butts."Two others, he said, beat his hands with lengths of two-by-fours, breaking the bones.

The first priority is to use force, might, beatings. This is considered more effective than detention ... because he may then resume stoning soldiers. But if troops break his hand, he won't be able to throw stones. - New York Times, January 21, 1988.

AGAINST AN UNARMED CIVILIAN POPULATION.

No matter which house one calls, the anguished accounts of family members wounded or arrested pour forth. Convoys of buses cruise the streets of Nablus followed by vans of the Mossad, Israel's secret police. Army units go from house to house pulling youths from their beds at 3 a.m. As the buses fill, the soldiers beat the youths viciously around the head, shins, groin and back. Shrieks fill the air.

AGAINST AN UNARMED CIVILIAN POPULATION.

By April 1988 over 150 Palestinians had died. The Israeli government had admitted to the arrest of 2,000 people, bringing the acknowledged total to 4,000. The real figure was far higher.

Sources in the West Bank and Gaza established that the number detained by the weekend of March 27 had exceeded 13,000. Bbuttam Shaka'a, deposed Mayor of Nablus, placed the total held solely in a hastily constructed barbed-wire encampment at Dhariyah at 10,000.

And under these conditions people have no chance of being molested? Children and parents would complain loudly about paedophilia, rape, forced incest, sadistic and perverted against them? Of course and the church, there are christians in this crowd that your jewish brothers dont like to talk about, did the church race to check the wellbeing of there followers, were they even allowed? God would approve according to the Christian Evangelical Church-s led by G.Bush and our other Christian insbreastutions?

TWO OF THE CHILDREN, AGES 9 AND 11 , WERE TAKEN BY THE SOLDIERS IN THEIR night clothes, frog-marched in the streets and beaten as they were forced by the jeering soldiers to clear debris.

In the Balata camp outside Nablus, and in the Casbah - the old quarter - l, 000 people were arrested in a period of 48 hours. The discovery of people in ditches in the fields - shot in the back or with their heads caved in - has been reported from villages throughout the West Bank and Gaza

NEW YORK TIMES Fleets of helicopters fly over Nablus at night dropping a dense, green toxic gas over the city. The smell pervades every house. Armed units fire canisters of the substance into houses at random. Doctors at Ittihad Hospital reported several rests and severe lung injuries from this as-yet unidentified asphyxiating chemical, totally distinct from tear gas.

Among the victims was the grandmother of the Da'as family and the 100-year-old father of noted Nablus attorney Mohammad Irshaid. Soldiers had entered the house at 2 a.m., smashing furniture and firing a canister of the dreaded green gas while preventing the family from leaving.

Simultaneously, the Israeli army targeted the hospitals. Army trucks rammed ambulances and blocked them from reaching the homes of those overcome by the gas. Soldiers entered the Ittihad Hospital in Nablus numerous times, arresting the wounded and those waiting to give blood to family members. EVEN THE OPERATING THEATRE WAS INVADED WHILE SURGEONS WERE OPERATING ON PATIENTS.

DOCTORS WERE BEATEN AND EQUIPMENT SMASHED. FAMILY MEMBERS WERE PREVENTED FROM ENTERING THE HOSPITAL AND THE CARS OF DOCTORS AND NURSES WERE DESTROYED BY SOLDIERS.

Meanwhile, all of Nablus was paralysed by a total strike. All the streets in every quarter of the city were without open shops or business activity. As gas permeated the city, cries and chants filled the night.

Gas canisters recovered by Bbuttam Shaka'a, Yousef al-Masri chief of Ittihad Hospital and American author Alfred Lilienthal bear the markings "560 cs. Federal Lab. Saltsburg, Pa. USA MK2 1988." Biochemists are studying their properties as casualties mount.

JOHN KIFNER reported on April 4 that "Hundreds of refugees were treated in United Nations clinics for gas inhalation." On April 15, Kifner wrote, "...gas has been thrown inside homes, clinics and schools where the effects are particularly severe."

Check Number of prisoners in Auschwitz.

CROSSES AT AUSCHWITZ

Historian--Jews consistently call for the removal of Christian symbols from Auschwitz even though statistics at Auschwitz demonstrate that at least 80% of the labor at that work camp were non-Jews--e.g., Christians and Moslems--yet the Jews are only interested in Jewish-oriented rests and not in the others. Very few persons who survived Auschwitz discuss the gbutting of Jews or others there, except for the Jews who were interrogated for the Nuremberg Show Trial in 1947. In addition, the Red Cross was on-site at Auschwitz for all three years in question and reported no gbuttings at all occuring. This is embarrbutting to the Simon Wiesenthal Center. At Nuremberg, the figure of 4.5 million Jews gbutted at Auschwitz was offered based not on facts but on a mathematical formula--e.g., if the ovens worked full time 24 hours per day, 4.5 million could have been consumed, and, therefore, we know it happened. This was a specious argument, and recently the real figures of rests at Auschwitz were released in Moscow to the chagrin of the ADL and Wiesenthal Trotskyite Factionalists. In addition, the same types of testimony given by Jews about Germans gbutting people at the work camps were given by Polish testimonials concerning the Germans lining up the Polish officers at Katyn Forest and killing them; however, no German EVER end a Polish Officer at Katyn, because the Russians (who took testimonies for BOTH Katyn Forest and Auschwitz for use at Nuremberg) admitted killing all of the Polish Officers at the Katyn Forest. So, since probable lies were admitted as testimony concerning the Katyn Forest Mbuttacre of 40,000 Poles by Germans when all along the Russians knew Russian Jews did this, then all of the testimony at Nuremberg is called into question, because all of it came from Russian interrogators who let those testifying know that there were certain things they wanted to hear or else. Rudolf Hess and others were tortured to make them submit "properly approved" testimony at Nuremberg.

. In his 1983 book, Zionism in the Age of the Dictators, Lenni Brenner shows that 20th century Zionists observed shockingly few limits to that expediency. Not surprisingly, the book received little coverage in the American media. 83155

DOES OPRAH AND OTHER MEDIA PERSONALITIES KNOW WHAT THEY ARE BACKING OR JUST TO SCARED
LINKS THAT WERE BROKEN 2 SNOWY HAIRED 7 AND 8 YEAR OLD KIDS , A GIRL AND A BOY...

51 Documents also sheds a whole new light on the term Holocaust guilt, frequently understood to mean Western, non-Jewish guilt for not acting against the Holocaust earlier. However, these documents make it clear that Holocaust guilt began with those Zionists who made the undoubtedly difficult, but politically expedient choice to place Eretz-Israel at the top of their priorities, above the lives of their threatened European brethren.

From a Zionist Executive Meeting speech by Yitzhak Gruenbaum on Feb.18, 1943:

Without Jewish co operation through the zionists the Germans would never have had the resources to herd the Jews into the various camps. And the zionists made it impossible for the underground to trust the jews. Like elsewhere, the only people who had the information and the ear of the frightened Jewish population were the Judenrat. In this case the Judenrat comprised mainly the Zionist Federation members. Without their help the SS, with 19 officers and less than 90 men, plus a few hundred Hungarian police, could not have collected and controlled a million Jews, when they did not even know their whereabouts.

Is The same authors also describe co-operation between Zionist leaders and Eichmann. It is interesting to note that the extreme right-wing revisionists only chose wealthy Jews for emigration, whereas other Zionists insisted on taking only young and healthy Jews. Eichmann helped them to carry out these plans, in return for which the Zionist Organization paid large sums to the Nazis. As Kimche says about the Zionist delegates in Germany: They had not come to Germany to save Jews. That was not their job. When the Nazis began the systematic liquidate of Jews in 1941, the Zionists decided neither to support Jewish resistance in Europe, nor to attack the Nazis, nor to say anything about the mbutt liquidation of their fellow Jews. Their sole purpose was to save certain selected Jews as future settlers in Palestine. They were not interested in Jews who wished to stay in their home countries and fight the Nazis.

SO THAT IS WHY SO MANY DIED ÁV PERHAPS CHILDREN AND OLDER PEOPLE JUST WERENT AS ROBUST ? AND IN ANY CASE WHATEVER NAZIS SAID DID NOT SHIFT THE ZIONIST VISION OF ONLY HEALTHY BODIES.

"Kastner must be brought to trial as a Nazi collaborator. And at this trial, Kastner should defend himself as a private citizen, and not be defended by the Israeli Government..." (14 July 1955).

*Haboker*, the pro-Government General Zionist party paper stated:

"The public wants to know the real facts about Kastner, and not about him alone. The only way to find out the truth is to put all the Rescue Committee people on trial and give them a chance to offer their defense." (23 June 1955)

But public opinion was not quite unanimous. The problem with bringing Kastner and his buttociates to trial was that his buttociates were the Government of Israel.

As the evening paper *Yedi'ot Aharonot* said:

"If Kastner is brought to trial the entire government faces a total political and national collapse - as a result of what such a trial may disclose." (23 June 1955)

Among them was Dr. Kastner, leader of the council which spoke for all Jews in Hungary. While I was prisoner number 44070 at Auschwitz - the number is still on my arm

deportation trains without knowing their fate. They were full of confidence in the false information that they were being transferred to Kenyermeze. The Nazis could not have misled the mbuttes of Jews so conclusively had they not spread their false information through Jewish channels. The Jews of the ghettos would not have trusted the Nazi or Hungarian rulers. But they had trust in their Jewish leaders. Eichmann and others used this known fact as part of their calculated plan to mislead the Jews. They were able to deport the Jews to their extermination by the help of Jewish leaders. The false information was spread by the Jewish leaders. The local leaders of the Jews of Kluj and Nodvarod knew that other leaders were spreading such false information and did not protest. Those of the Jews who tried to warn their friends of the truth were persecuted by the Jewish leaders in charge of the local 'rescue work'. The trust of the Jews in the misleading information and their lack of knowledge that their wives, children and themselves were about to be deported to the gas chambers of Auschwitz led the victims to remain quiescent in their ghettos. It seduced them into not resisting or hampering the deportation orders. Dozens of thousands of Jews were guarded in their ghettos by a few dozen police. Yet even vigorous young Jews made no attemptt to overpower these few guards and escape to nearby Rumania. No resistance activities to the deportations were organized in these ghettos. And the Jewish leaders did everything in their power to soothe the Jews in the ghettos and to prevent such resistance activities. The same Jews who spread in Kluj and Nodvarod the false rumor of Kenyermeze, or confirmed it, the same public leaders who did not warn their own people against the misleading statements, the same Jewish leaders who did not organize any resistance or any sabotage of deportations...these same leaders did not join the people of their community in their ride to Auschwitz, but were all included in the Rescue train.

 



Your Ad Here


Soc Culture Australia from Newsgroups

The #1 Usenet Newsgroup Provider on the Internet

List | Previous | Next