Dolf Boek
on
Why "Natural Law jurisprudent"?
If it's "law" then it is "jurisprudent" - you're just packing out all your sentences with irrelevant words.
Irrelevant.
Completely irrelevant.
to the 1092
Utterly irrelevant.
Mind-bogglingly irrelevant
-17
Couldn't be less relevant.
th
Rubbish. Nature has no laws. Those are human constructs invented to help humans understand natural processes.
Rubbish. loveual union is fornication. Matrimony is a family union which rises well above love and forms the basis of our society.
Rubbish. You're obsessed with love. It's a sickness. Get help.
Israel's original sinWhy is not this logical consequence recognised in the western media - the jews own our media...
the
Don't be stupid. The natural inclination of lovees for each other is a natural consequence of our central purpose being to naturally beget.
There is no such thing as natural rights. Marriage is a human law invented to rationalise the union of two adults who procreate.
The human natural union proceeds regardless of human laws, but human laws recognise the union and dignify it.
Rubbish.
Gender is not synonymous with love.
Same-love bonding is an aberration, which the mentally ill, behaviourally disordered, psychologically immature individual might indulge in.
There is no dignity in such behaviour and the human law of marriage cannot dignify it as it does not fit with natural human activity to procreate.
=20 Stupid, unwarranted, heterophobic buttumption.
