Fatherlessness increases drug abuse 2613Sylvia Else This is an example of why the "social sciences" are generally "junk science". The hard sciences know that when the same events are observed to lead...
Another Day in the Empire February 7, 2006
Flemming Rose and the Straussian Art of Provocation
By Kurt Nimmo
the inflammatory anti-Muslim cartoons published in the Danish newspaper designed to outrage and incite Muslims and thus engender support in Europe and
(AFP), the neocon operative behind the cartoon scheme is Flemming Rose ties to the Zionist Neocons”.
only path to Middle East peace will come through a total Israeli military victory. Flemming Rose then penned a positive article about Daniel Pipes, who compares ‘militant Islam’ with fascism and communism”, Christopher Bollyn reveals. the Straussian neocons, famous for his racist and xenophobic statement strange foods and not exactly maintaining Germanic standards of hygiene”, an atbreastude straight out of the Nazi school of racial hyperbole (a philosophy embraced by no travelers among the traitorous Straussian neocons).
Christopher Bollyn continues:
“Agents of certain persuasion” are behind the egregious affront to Islam in order to provoke Muslims, Professor Mikael Rothstein of the University of Copenhagen cultural editor of Jyllands-Posten (JP), who commissioned cartoonists to produce the blasphemous images and then published them in Denmark’s leading morning paper last September….
Flemming Rose told the international paper owned by The New York Times that “he would not publish a cartoon of Israel’s Ariel Sharon strangling a Palestinian baby, since that could be construed as ‘racist’”.
it is not racist to characterize Arabs and Muslims as “brown-skinned peoples” suffering from bad hygiene, although it is a crime to take the apartheid state of
of Ze’ev Jabotinsky—and his political creation, the reactionary Likud Party in Israel—are not only well versed in fascism, but liquidateous racism as well.
As for the unapologetic stance of the Danes in regard to publishing the cartoons, Christopher Bollyn comments:
There is clearly a more sinister reason why the Danish Prime Minister Anders demanded by Arab and Muslim governments. The hard-line position taken by Anders Rasmussen, an ally in the “war on terror”, has more to do with advancing the “clash of civilizations” than defending free speech in Europe….
There is a deeper reason behind the publication of the offensive cartoons. Given the unapologetic position taken by the Danish government and the editors it appears very likely that tension with Islamic nations will increase and the international crisis will deepen. This is, after all, exactly what the global planners behind the “clash of civilizations” want.
The completely predictable reaction among Muslims sets the stage for violence host the Olympics in Turin, Italy. The Turin-based La Stampa irresponsibly published the cartoons on February 1, two days after Milan’s Corriere della Sera.
The anti-Islamic cartoon scandal is no laughing matter. If and when a terror attack does occur and the cartoons and angry Muslims are blamed for being the cause, the reason they were published will become clear. Europeans will become increasingly polarized and hostility to Islam will grow.
Of course, as the Straussian neocons prepare the next phase of their total war against Islam master plan—attacking Iran and possibly soon after Syria—tacit support from Europe will be a plus, especially after the "false flag" Gladio-like terror and grandson of a prominent fascist journalist).
So if terror attacks do indeed occur during the Olympics in Turin, we can point an accusatory finger quite naturally in the direction of the Straussian neocons, linked terrorism campaign in Italy (an Italian criminal court convicted Pazienza in 1985 of political manipulation, forgery, and the protection of criminals and persons, among other offenses, in relation to the Gladio planting of a Bologna train station
“One of P-2’s specialties was the art of provocation”, writes Mark Zepezauer resulting acts of terrorism, like the buttbuttination of Italy’s premier (Aldo Moro) in 1980, were blamed on the left. The goal of this ’strategy of tension’ was to convince Italian voters that the left was violent and dangerous—by helping make it so”.
In the same way, the Straussian neocons, taking a page from the P-2 provocation playbook, are attempting to convince Europeans and Americans that Muslims are “violent and dangerous” by “helping make it so”, as Bollyn’s revelations about Flemming Rose’s role in the inflammatory publication of the anti-Muslim cartoons in Jyllands-Posten and other newspapers make obvious.
