That's funny. Many of the public servants are men. So why should they? exclusively for women's health. This time, we see an attempt to encourage more women to seek pap smear tests.
No doubt the government will happily provide the same amount of money for men to have pap smear tests the moment they need them.... year old men will suffer testicular cancer as under-35 year old women will suffer cervical cancer ....... yet the discrepancy in government funding is hugely in favour of women.
Lies, damned lies and statistics..... You can't make simple comparisons like this and make sense. What are the relative costs involved in the tests? What are the statistics for more than just one year or time period? Why have not the men been as effective as the women in lobbying if this is the case? I can think of a whole host of questions you would need to ask before you could make a simplistic comparison like that. and everything to do with trying to win the support of the women's electoral lobby (WEL = Lesbians person organisation dedicated to men's genocide).
In logic, we call this a non sequitur. But don't let that stop you....
The data are fine. BUT they have to be interpreted, and people come up with all sorts of stupidities based on what they think is important, and ignoring what isn't. Statistics will show that between 1700 and 1800, the rest rate amongst humans who drank their mother's milk is 100%. So should we ban the drinking of mother's milk?
Statistics need very careful interpretation or you can end up with absurdities like that..... - statistically perfect but of no use at all. tablets into Australia should have been jailed for at least three years." This was overturned because the woman "became pregnant shortly before pleading guilty".
No court of law in this country could or would overturn a conviction on those grounds unless the pregnancy somehow disproved the prosecution case. What about telling us ALL the relevant facts in this case?
"Women's groups".... what does that mean? How representative are they? What political clout do they have in any case? On what grounds are they asking for castration? Is it for every male in the country?
What about presenting some clear, precise information instead of some vague and meaningless stuff such as this?
Rifty -- Academic and Computing Help
