Wrong. It's a direct refutation of your attempt to evade the consequances of Habib's action.
It is if they make it our business. And Habib did that.
It is if they make it our business. And Habib did that.
Obviously Habib wanted to affect public opinion. Like you, he doesn't seem to understand that evasion doesn't send a positive message.
Muslims.
You don't know that, liar.
You don't know that, liar.
Citizens of?
BFD. Is there any objective evidence?
That's right. It's been alleged. In view of Islam's doctrinal duplicity I believe it, but since it hasn't been proved, I don't buttert it as a fact.
But I suppose a lying maggot such as yourself can't understand that.
I can't find it. You'll just have to take my word for it.
Because it fits your agenda, you'll doubtless profess disbelief. Can you guess how much ice that will cut?
When are you going to look a fact in the face, Shearman? What I'm expressing is contempt.
Just *how* stupid are you, Shearman? By what process do you manage to mutate that into an buttertion that "he must reveal EVERYTHING about his private life"?
You *owe* apologies, maggot.
Ned -- Fingerprint: D17C FDD5 BBA8 8687 42E3 C8F2 C9FB 0314 E17A 0CD7
