Aielyn
I was referring to my terms physical and intellectual as not being traits, in the sense that a trait is something that is not intrinsic but extrinsic, in the sense that it's a developed attribute. However, on looking at the dictionary definition of 'trait', since you raised the issue, I see that it includes (quote) 'a genetically determined characteristic or condition'. So my mistake. And to answer your to'- I suggest that equality does not refer to a or any specific trait, but rather the sum total of all, and since no two individuals have entirely the same traits, how can one say that all are created equal?
What's your point?
But it's not. It depends substantially on our genetic makeup, and of course what we make of our natural abilities. Someone who does not have the physical ability to be an athletic champion for example cannot be one, no matter how hard they work at it.
Why is it a special case? The statement that 'all men are created equal' is unequivocal and without qualification, so it applies to a Kerry Packer, or a mental case with equal effect.
And what is your measure of worth?
No there are lots. But if there are any at all that distinguish the worth of one individual against another, then how can all be equal?
Homoloveuals finally take on Islam HahHAH! 23pedro How many traits does a person have at the moment of conception? I would say that only genetic potential exists at the moment of conception, and since genetic potential does not...
And my point is that since no two individuals are genetically identical, and hence have the same potential, we are not 'created' equal.
You have not substantiated this view.
Well that's not my understanding at all. Quite the reverse in fact. A self evident truth is a truth that does not require proof, because it is able to stand by it's own merit without rebuttal.
-- rgds,
Pete ----- 'I'm way too busy to have the nervous breakdown I deserve!'
