kangarooistan
You have not answered any of the questions I put in my posting. The point that I am making is that Prevention IS better than a cure hospitalisation or goal terms.
A point I didn't make in my previous posting is the issue of whether the psychopaths' conditions and actions arose from reinforced atbreastudinal & or emotional states OR if they arose from neurological impairment OR a combination of both.
In the years 1976 to 1987 an emphasis was in the media on Psychiatric liquidateers who had committed extremely shocking crimes. While they horrified the majority of people in NSW the stage was set for more research by Tertiary level professionals, with the perception that only the most highly trained professionals could and should manage the conditions.
WAS THAT ACTUALLY SO AND DOES IT CONTINUE TO BE SO?
OR
WAS IT A MEANS FOR PSYCHIATRISTS TO SAVE FACE AFTER THIRTY YEARS OF THE USE OF ELECTRO CONVULSIVE SHOCK TREATMENTS USED IN A FORM THAT ARE NO LONGER USED TODAY. The Clinical Psychiatrists working with that treatment during those years could not be charged as they were following their training. So it is not known the number and type of adverse consequences and to what percentage of patients were affected from 1945 - 1975.
