very good, and mighty smart of you, fred. since you have shown the maturity, you are ripe for some future life-saving education,, and i am taking my time to inform you as follows.
there is one more group of people to watch out for in the west because it is now very active: it is the indian communists who bear hindu names - why they don't have names like stalinovosky is a mystery. to win the war on terror conclusively, you must understand this group. they are albeit small but they are very contagionous and very crafty.
actually, these indian commies are far more dangerous, for they blur the difference, and they ally with mommedans. it takes certain experience to know them. usually, they are a part of "south asian" or "asian"organizations, designed to include and sanitize the pakis and bangladeshi mommedans, given the geography; they are never part of "hindu" organizations or pure "indian" organizations. they never have anything good to say about hinduism. in india they seek to gain power by staging violent strikes at the doors of business places, using terror as political weapon, and running down hinduism and hindus, and making mommedan style demands that you never can fully meet. these commies must have mommedans as their natural allies; if you fail to understand this, you can not win war on terror. the reason is indian commies occupy positions of influence in western universities' history dept where they never teach indian history, but teach south asian history and use their privileged postions to influence policies against the hindus. (fyi, they were the real reason why the chief minister of gujarat, mr. modi, was denied visa in usa as they waged a campaign by roping in the cair, a mommedan interest group and whole bunch of bush-friendly missionaries). the indian commies have the momentum, and are the number one reason for the maoist insurgency in nepal, and they are more ambitious than the russian commies, and more dangerous because they can always use camoflage and play double role. ironically, because they run down hindus, they are more acceptable in the west for their amusement value. remember, you heard this super valuable information here.
How to boycott muslims 3598V S Rawat Sure. You fellow Hindu extremists is a well known west hater yet naturally he chooses to make it...
i must point out at this point that there is a crazy, counterproductive atbreastude in the media in britain, australia, canada and small parts of usa (michigan and parts of northeast like maine where mommedans are in large numbers) to club the hindus and mommedans into one group. (danger: this atbreastude is deliberately encouraged by indian commies from their south asian history depts). this is despite the known fact that the hindus and mommedans are poles apart, more so - believe it or not - than the west is from the mommedan world.
brit media club them as "asians" and others club them as "south asians" (because the american state dept has a one small "south asia" desk) as if the hindus and the mommedans are one interest group. it took 9-11 for the usa to rethink and correct its stupid policy, thanks to the bjp; brits have really no excuse, so their policy is one of michief-making which now 7-7 will hopefully rectify.
it's now left to smart citizens like you to correct your local media and pull them out of the groove since usa now is looking to india to help out at what is believed in usa as the chinese menace, a policy which the hindus are bracing themselves that it would not take a violent turn but mold the chinese into integrating themselves fully in the world economy as we know it. future world peace could well depend on this wild card that involves how the west differentiates the hindus (who are naturally west friendly) from the indian commies and the mommedans while reigning in their "if i see a poor i see a potential convert" missionaries for the time being until the problem is taken care of.
muslim. decades
