On Wed, 11 Jan 2006 20:05:57 -0800, Aielyn
Obviously you don't understand. Some dim-wit posted a proposition, and I asked for its creator's name and its context. Anyone who posts such a proposition should be able to show that they understand it. Otherwise, they are engaging in a bit of idle wanking.
You would know quite a lot about that.
As expected, apart from a very simple attempt to get the answers on Google, the responses have been rather disappointing.
I don't have to demonstrate what I know, because I didn't claim to understand it. Follow?
See above. I'm telling you that you don't understand, so your saying anything is otiose.
Otiose.
ID Cards On The Agenda Again 361Gawd Let's review the thread, shall we: John posted about ID cards, and how he has no problem with them, but expects others to. Who...
You are waffling and blathering.
Ditto.
Gratuitous ad hom.
Lie! I did not fail to respond. I merely treated you with the contempt that you deserve!
Very long-winded, I'm afraid. You have the problem of not seeing the wood for the trees. It seems that you are somewhat aware of that, but find it difficult to make the necessary jump required to think clearly.
I'm prepared to help, if you wish. Everyone should attempt to get to secondary school, and you really should take offers of buttistance freely given.
