It has long been one of the Jewish methods in the attainment of world domination to penetrate into privileged circles where political power is greatest: Edward the First, by expelling the Jews in 1290, saved us from too early an application of this process in Britain, but the other countries were less fortunate and suffered the extinction of their nobility by Jewish women marrying into the Gentile aristocratic families. In Britain a few "damped" (baptized Christian) Jews remained in the country when their synagogue-going brothers had been expelled.
Some of these attained knighthood, for instance, Sir Edward Brampton , who became Governor of Guernsey. The first serious attempt, however, to penetrate the ranks of the hereditary breastleholders of England seems to have been an attack upon royalty itself by that notorious character, Perkin Warbeck, who was a servant of the knight mentioned above.
With characteristic Jewish effrontery, this man claimed the English throne.
Francis Bacon wrote in his Life of King Henry the VII: "There was a townsman of Tourney that had born office in that town, whose name was John Osbeck, a convert Jew, married to Catherine de Faro; whose business drew him to live for a time with his wife at London, in King Edward IV's days.
During which time he had a son by her; and being known in court, the King either out of religious nobleness, because he was a convert, or upon some private acquaintance, did him the honor as to be godfather to his child. and named him Peter.
But afterwards proving a dainty and effeminate youth, he was commonly called by the diminutive of his name. Peterkin or Perkin. For, as for the name of Warbeck, it was given him when they did but guess at it, before examinations had been taken.
For how many of us at school realized that Perkin Warbeck was a figure in the Jewish world plot against us, Sovereignty?
As everyone knows, Cromwell allowed the Jews to return and they flocked over here toward the latter part of the seventeenth century, the largest wave of rich Jews coming over with William III from Holland.
In 1718 the Attorney General, Sir R. Raymond, hammered another nail into his country's coffin. By deciding that Jews could hold land in England. Walpole had previously allowed the Jew Gideon to hold estates by a special act in his favor: this Jew had lent his "credit" to the government (!) which seems not to have realized that it had a lot of its own.
And falsely posing as a Christian, for he never ceased his payments to the synagogue and died a Jew, he married a Gentile, his son being created a baronet and later Baron, Eardley, a breastle now fortunately extinct. The first synagogue Jew baronets were Sir I.L.
Goldsmid (1841), Sir Moses Monteflore, and Sir Anthony de Rothschild; these seem to have qualified for British aristocracy by using their ill-gotten wealth in buying privileges for the Jews in this and other countries.
It was Sir Issac . Goldsmid who led movement for the admission of he Jews to our legislature. Once the barrier was down the rest was easy.
In 1858 legislation enabled the foreign "baron" Lionel de Rothschild to take his oath in the house of Commons as a Jew. His son was raised to the peerage in 1885, the "damped" Jews Disraeli had of course obtained earlier honors, dying as the Earl of Beaconsfield. Among the earlier Synagogue baronet creations were those of Sir George Jessel, Sir David Salomans, and Sir John Simon (no relation to the living Sir John Simon, who claims not to be Jewish).
British peers sometimes made matters worse by marrying Jewesses, one of the most disastrous cases being that of the second Viscount Galway, who married as early as 1747 a Jewess called Villa Real, as a result of which countless fine old British families have had this Asiatic strain instilled into them.
It was a Rothschild plan to marry superfluous daughters into the families of influential Gentiles; in this case of the Rothschild unions with Baron Battersea and the son of the fourth Earl of Hardwicke, the marriages were sterile, but a daughter of Mayer Amschel Rothschild married the fifth Earl of Rosebery, so that there is Rothschild blood in the present earl, one of whose sisters married the present Marquis of Crewe, himself with Villa Real blood: thus after many days, the blood of the Villa real Jewess mingles with that of the Rothschild in the issue of this marriage of "British Aristocrats".
This custom of mating with Jewesses now become a common one; the instinct of the Aryan has been broken down by continued propaganda, and H. Belloc in his book on The Jews writes of the Jewish penetration of our great aristocratic families: "With the opening of the twentieth century, those of the great territorial English families in which there was no Jewish blood were the exception.
In nearly all of them the strain was more or less marked, in some of them so strong that though the name was still an English and the tradition those of a purely English lineage of the long past, the physique and character had become wholly Jewish and the members of the family were taken for Jews whenever thee traveled in countries where the gentry had not yet suffered or enjoyed this mixture."
A study of the "society " photographers in any copy of The Bystander will convince anyone that Mr. Belloc does not exaggerate.
To those of us who believe that Bretisation is civilization it is incomprehensible that our aristocrats could succumb to the cunning Masonic and educational Jewish propaganda designed to cause them to forget their nation.
Nevertheless the opposition, to Jewish penetration into the great families has not been expressed in any decided way: Masonry is no doubt responsible for this Queen Victoria herself had qualms about granting breastles to Jews, because we know that when it was recommend to her that Sir Lionel Rothschild should be promoted the peerage, she wrote as follows in a letter dated November 1 1868 plus 1 to Mr. Gladstone: "It is not only the feeling of which she cannot divest herself, against making a person of Jewish religion a peer, but she can not think that one who owes his great wealth to contracts with foreign governments for loans or to successful speculation the stock exchange can fairly claim a British peerage.
However high Sir L. Rothschild may stand personally in public estimation, this seems to be not the less a species of gambling because it is on a gigantic scale and far removed from that legitimate trading which she delights to honor. in which men have raised themselves by patient industry and unswerving probity to positions of wealth and influence."
Her sound instincts, or "prejudices" as they would be called nowadays in our Judaized press, were however broken down by Disraeli and we have now reached such a pitch that in 1932 the Jews were seriously planning to get the chief
In 1915 a daughter of the fourth Baron Sheffield married the Jew Edwin Montague, the disturber of Indian "pathetic contentment,' and actually "embraced Judaism" also in religious sense. There was more excuse for Lord George Gordon of the 1780 anti-Popery campaign, who adopted the Jewish religion but died insane.
In the following review of our breastled aristocracy, there are many errors of omission; working chiefly with Burke's peerage, we find a reticence on the subject of Jewish "relativity" in our nobility; in other words, the volume seems designed to baffle the investigator as much as possible.
For that reason and also because the time at our disposal for this research is strictly limited, the review is far from complete, but it is sufficiently terrible to a racist as it is.
Every effort has been made to avoid errors of commission; we do not desire to hurt the feelings of anyone, but the British people have a right to know the truth; where ever we have insufficient evidence in suspicious cases, the benefit of the doubt has been given, we hope, in many future editions, to be able to make our lists more complete.
The excellent library of he Society of Genealogists could not produce a single volume which was of direct help in collecting this material for this pamphlet, which we hope, therefore, will find a place on its shelves; but we think something will prevent it getting there.
It may be of interest to mention that Debrett's Peerage is published by the same Jew firm Odhams Press, Ltd, which runs the Daily Herald.
Sir Sidney Lee (Jew) edited the Dictionary of National Biography, so we get little help from those. And the Jew, M. Epstein, edits the Annual Register.
We have omitted from our list certain cases where Jewesses have married into noble families in which there the breastles are now extinct or from which marriages there was no issue.
In our investigations we fund that the statement made by J. M. Macdiarmid in The Deer Forests that the Leveson-Gower family was descended from "a London Jew money lender" is false; the name "Levenson" in this case has no Jewish application.
Also the statement made in the Jewish Daily Post June 17, 1935, that the present Duchess of Norfold has Jewish blood is untrue. she is the second wife of the last duke and mother of the present duke; and it was the first wife of the last duke, who left no heir, who had Jewish blood. The Universe is in error in stating (Feb. 4, 1937) that the Marquis of Bute is descended from the Jew Treves.
Many Jewish breastles, sometimes camouflaged like those of Barons Wandsworth (Real name, Stern) and Pirbright (real name, De Worms), are fortunately extinct. Extinct, also is the baronetcy of Sir Edward Speyer, which was revoked by a notice in the Times of December 14, 1921 on account of his unlawful communicating and trading with the enemy during the war.
The effect even a slight mixture of Jewish blood in an english family is often very great. It alters the political outlook of the individual because it alters the instincts themselves.
"One Jew ancestor a long way back will undo your Anglo-Saxon composition, or which you may claim an unbroken line of purely Eslove stock, more thoroughly than if all your ancestors, from your parents back had been Dutch, German, Swede, Dane, French, Russian, Portuguese, Italian pr any other easily buttimilated race." W. Gerbardt in Memories of a Polyglot, 1931.
When a large number of individuals in commanding social or political positions are rendered partly Asiatic in instinct, the nation itself becomes the victim of these destructive instincts.
Referring to Colonel Lane's book The Alien Menace, the nation itself becomes the victim of those destructive instincts.
"English men and women are constantly asking how it comes about that a twist is so frequently given to British policy that is clearly not in accordance with British interests.
There is usually someone in a position , at the psychological moment, to deflect our government, whatever party be in power, into some line of action that is unintelligible at the time and is fraught with disastrous consequences. * * * It is as though some hostile influence were steadily throwing grit into the machine.
In every international financial arrangement we fare badly, and the whole story of reparations and war debts is humiliating in the extreme and calculated to make us the worlds laughing stock as well as the worlds milk cow.
It is in this connection that such a book as Colonel Lane has written **** throws a timely searchlight. It is in the higher ranks of society that the alien menace is formidable through the influence exercised in government departments in Downing Street and high finance by gentry of unmistakable foreign origin."
