The *facts* are that the majority sides with what we have stated, which is why we stated it. The fact that you can find some scientist somewhere who has an emotional attachment to a different opinion is *not* significant.
You are *not* being logical.
Matter of opinion. Continued attempts by Britain, New Zealand and the USA to distort public opinion by using false statements and appeals to emotions based on ignorance are not in the best interest of the world population, or for that matter those specific nations that do it or follow it.
You are not honest. Scientific opinion *clearly* has been that lethal research is the *only* way to get the required data. The fact that you can indeed find *some* scientists who do not think the data should be collected, is neither a logically valid point nor an honest statement on your part.
Bullpoo. There has been significant research done (some because of the statements that you quoted, which were false) and there is little question that whale meat is more healthy than beef.
That is another total distortion on your part. The fact that whale meat is not available, and that the small supply that does exist is of course very expensive is what has cause the shift that you cite.
Why is it you cannot be honest and show even a modicum of integrity?
--
