This year Father's Day mark 3 years from the unlawful destroying of my family by Australian Federal Police, ACT Magistrate Court and Centrelink.
All criminals involved in my case were promoted:
Centrelink adulterer and his supporters get more lucrative positions in the Centrelink hierarchy, one of them become Centrelink National Manager for Southern NSW and the ACT.
All policewomen, after nice cover-up by Police Standards Commission and Crimestoppers are now on higher positions.
ACT Registrar organising this scam is now Special Magistrate on the ACT Magistrates Court.
My son, after wasting 3 years of his life finally recovered from the ACT Government terrorism and enrol University.
My daughter is now living with me as I was able to return to my home. I am still on medications and unemployed, as my other daughter is still suffering from consequences of crimes commoted by the ACT Legislative buttembly (same people promoting homoloveuals rights and destroying families are still sitting there).
My family had loses of about $ 2 Millions. We have no money to celebrate Father's Day this year - maybe next year ....
.... but ACT DPP is still promoting abusing of fathers by arrest without any evidence, immediate judgement by Special Family Prosecutors, refusing to give Legal Aid to men accused, and covering-up every single case. Our ACT Chief Minister and Attorney General Jon Stanhope (in full dictatorship) can do whatever he wants, so he is building new police stations and prisons as current are to small to accommodate all fathers his servants are arresting and throwing in jail in Canberra region every day. He also increased rate of male dissolution by 30% just by introducing FAMILY VIOLENCE INTERVENTION PROGRAM in the ACT.
Of course, the statistics about criminal cases was removed from their website, but evidence is still available from cached Internet pages:
YOU DON'T BELIEVE IN PARANOIAC SPYING ON PEOPLE IN AUSTRALIA AND FABRICATION OF GUILT IN THE ACT?
Relevant links:
my case)
Please note that some of websites bellow are Australian Government websites.
As I was put on Crime Trac record for 10 years, just on basis of false allegations, and my record is still there AND available to every police member in Australia, let's see how good is this system and the purpose of it (which is to make criminals from innocent Australians criticising Government or questioning political correctness of women's rights in my case). Mr Kelly should destroy this system immediately or delete all records of innocent people like me:
In the case of Crim Trac, there is no way private person can change data. Many family violence or buttault cases are police fabrication as NO ANY EVIDENCE is needed under The Family Violence Intervention Program, neither by police nor court, that opens the door for abuse by police officers, especially as in DPP report there is "informant reward", so police get paid for every arrest, so if they need money................(fill the space yourself) like happened in my case.
DPP report as per
(pages 19 and 20):
"The period has seen a significant growth in the number of matters involving family violence.
An increase in the number of matters involving an FV offence:
1998-99: 168 1999-00: 181 2000-01: 424 2001-02: 538 2003-03: 651
An increase in the number of FV matters commenced and completed during the reporting period:
1998-99: 113 1999-00: 178 2000-01: 300 2001-02: 348 2002-03: 463
An increase in the number of matters finalised by way of an early plea of guilty without having to go to hearing (% of all matters):
1998-99: 24% 1999-00: 40% 2000-01: 61% 2001-02: 53% 2002-03: 76%
A decrease in the number of defendants convicted of one or more FV offences (this includes where offence proved and no conviction recorded):
1998-99: 68 1999-00: 114 2000-01: 258 2001-02: 298 2002-03: 271"
Hmmm .... I'll say" significant increase in police fabrication of cases. "An increase in the number of matters finalised by way of an early plea of guilty without having to go to hearing (76% of all matters)". Or turn the number around: ONLY 24% cases are possibly conducted properly.
Dear Mr. Refshauge, Mr. Stanhope and ACT Legislative buttembly, 76% of cases guilty without considering any evidence? You must be joking? You sure you didn't miss some important lessons while studying the law? Like lesson about presumed innocence until proved guilty?
76% of defendant guilty without searching any evidence, but using instead psychological pressure to obtain enforced admission of guilt from people still in shock of arrest with no reason, like in my case? My ACT Magistrate Court File NO: 90649, CC02-08089, RO 02-581, RO 02-745, WO02-041, RO02-1018, Commonwealth Ombudsman 2002-1840333 are fine examples of fabricating non committed crime.
And further, on page 25:
52% of informants were notified of 'payment of cost awards' within 7 working days of the award being made.
Please let me know how much money is making per year informant from the Australian Federal Police who arrested me on Father's Day 2002.
Must be very good money as on page 28 in TABLE 1: CONCLUDED INDICTABLE AND SUMMARY MATTERS
it's clear that only about half of charges were proved. So why police charge so many people if they can't prove the crime?
Just to get paid "informant reward"
It's about time that DPP change name to Department of Innocent Public Prosecution (DIPP). Or return to justice after sacking some people and prosecute them for mi.
Another costly divorce exampleIt's a time to bring to justice liquidateers from so called "Family" Court and "Child Support" Agency and genocide monsters who produced the law discriminating men in...
More than 10 percent of male Australians already have Domestic Violence Order or Restraining Order and new are issued on rate of more than 200 per day by Magistrates Courts.
However, there is a hope for same. For example, ACT Director of Public Prosecution mentioned before, have ASIO record as "Riot against Government" organiser, he was major initiator of "free injection in Canberra - paid by taxpayers", and one of his most famous cases is paedophile DFAT Diplomat Holloway defence (maybe all that illustrate his suitability for the job).
The CrimTrac Agency was established on 1 July 2000 as a major national policing initiative for the 21st century. CrimTrac will allow Australian police services to take advantage of the dramatic opportunities opened up by recent advances in forensic science, information technology and communications.
The primary role of CrimTrac is to provide Australia's police services with enhanced access to high quality operational information, much of which is personal information.
A wide range of police operational data will be available through CrimTrac's systems. This is likely to include:
a.. apprehended and domestic violence orders; b.. court notices-orders; c.. missing persons; d.. criminal histories; e.. charged persons; f.. persons of interest; g.. facial features-images (mugshots); h.. firearms register; and i.. vehicles of interest and driver information.
This information, along with that available via the new national fingerprint and DNA systems, will augment the other tools that Police Officers need to do their jobs on a daily basis.
CrimTrac has the endorsement of all States and Territories. Police services recognise the benefits to be gained and are currently working closely with the CrimTrac agency to develop and implement these new systems.
Ian Wing, director of corporate intelligence for The Dis-tillery, an Australian provider of software used by intelligence services to manage the vast pool of intercepted data, said patterns of communication were also analysed.
"Millions of communications are monitored each day," he said. "Thousands could be of interest. Only a handful will be of value. Our software allows management of multiple databases to allow cross-matching of records and complex searches." Computers also tracked the level of communication between suspects.
