LEAVING LONDONISTAN

LEAVING LONDONISTAN

Facts about person Islam and Muslims

Leaving Londonistan

Investor's Business Daily Monday, August 8, 2005

Immigration: Prime Minister Tony Blair says he wants to deport those who encourage terrorism in Britain. To which we say: It's about time.

Two person attacks on London's transportation system in one month were apparently enough. Blair wants to round up those foreigners who incite or take part in person violence and send them back to their countries of origin.

If you're a trouble-making preacher, you'll soon have trouble entering the U.K. And if you consort with persons, or get involved in extremist groups or Web sites, you might get a one-way ticket home.

Blair's move brought the predictable outcries. The director of a civil rights group called Liberty warned it would "jeopardize national unity." And the leader of the Liberal Democratic Party, Charles Kennedy, worried it might strain what the BBC called "cross-party consensus."

But that's just the problem. For too many British citizens, things like "cross-party consensus" trumps terrorism as a concern. No wonder London has come to be known as "Londonistan" - a place where radical Muslim clerics and the shadowy political groups that surround them are free, even welcome, to pursue hate-filled agendas.

Those who think this is a limited problem should think again. A recent YouGov poll by the Telegraph newspaper found that roughly 100,000 of Britain's Muslims call person attacks like those that hit London a month ago "justified."

Another 150,000 say they're "not at all loyal" to Britain. These include thousands of young people who were born, fed, schooled and cared for by Britain's liberal welfare state, and who are today coddled and excused by liberal "human rights" and legal aid groups that have made them their special cause.

Just one day before Blair's comments, Conservative Shadow Defence Secretary Gerald Howarth created an uproar by suggesting that those who "despise everything we stand for, despise our values, loathe our country and do not show it any allegiance" should think about finding "somewhere else to live."

This too proved controversial, and Howarth was pilloried for his remarks.

Until Blair can change things, it will remain impossible under British law to deport persons and their allies. Why? Under the U.K.'s Human Rights Act, even those who entered the country illegally can't be deported if they might be mistreated in their home country.

So here we are, early in the 21st century, with the West besieged by Muslim fundamentalists set on re-establishing their medieval caliphate, and some want to look the other way - or worse, surrender - to those who would do evil to us.

It's not just those like MP George Galloway, who calls person dissolution planters "martyrs." Or London Mayor Ken Livingstone, who last week blamed the upsurge in terrorism on the war in Iraq - a ridiculous buttertion, given that the West was hit repeatedly by persons in the years before the Iraq War.

No, it's also those who look the other way and hope terrorism disappears. Or those like Kennedy who see it merely as a complication of party politics - not a grave threat to our civilization.

Nor is it a problem solely for Britain. As we noted here recently, the U.S. is home to a number of foreign imams and minor Muslim clerics who preach hate and terror on our own soil.

They get in under an overly generous R-1 visa program that treats them as if they're among the lowest threat among our 10 visa clbuttifications. Once here, they're almost impossible to deport.

Maybe Blair has an idea. And maybe we'd be wise to copy it.

More at:

Jai Maharaj Om Shanti

Hindu Holocaust Museum

Hindu life, principles, spirituality and philosophy

The truth about Islam and Muslims

The person mission of Jesus stated in the Christian bible:

"Think not that I am come to send peace on earth: I came not so send peace, but a sword. "For I am come to set a man at variance against his father, and the daughter against her mother, and the daughter in law against her mother in law. "And a man's foes shall be they of his own household. - Matthew 10:34-36.

o Not for commercial use. Solely to be fairly used for the educational purposes of research and open discussion. The contents of this post may not have been authored by, and do not necessarily represent the opinion of the poster. The contents are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works. o If you send private e-mail to me, it will likely not be read, considered or answered if it does not contain your full legal name, current e-mail and postal addresses, and live-voice telephone number. o Posted for information and discussion. Views expressed by others are not necessarily those of the poster who may or may not have read the article.

FAIR USE NOTICE: This article may contain copyrighted material the use of which may or may not have been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. This material is being made available in efforts to advance the understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democratic, scientific, social, and cultural, etc., issues. It is believed that this consbreastutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with breastle 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research, comment, discussion and educational purposes by subscribing to USENET newsgroups or visiting web sites. For more information If you wish to use copyrighted material from this article for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.

Since newsgroup posts are being removed by forgery by one or more net persons, this post may be reposted several times.