Lesbian agenda to corrupt society

Lesbian agenda to corrupt society ?

Perhaps we have found a macro model of how a cancer works in the body...a cell corrupted, attacks itself...

The march to defend marriage, appears to be unrealistically manipulated as being something it is not.

Let us appreciate that the rhetoric about marriage is full of illogical statements. One that the current definition of marriage and heteroloveuals are discriminating. Truth is gays and lesbians discriminate against members of the opposite love, as do many of the other definitions within Canadian Law such as elderly, disabled, and seniors; i hope that the writers do not believe that all discriminate is wrong, ethically, morally and logically ?

The letters in The Chronicle Journal of May 21, 2005 refers to the negative view of children and their parents in this rally, and raises some serious questions. If the gay and lesbian community can manipulate 'homoloveuality' as normal, as one writer writes, and corrupt the definition of marriage beyond that which is generally accepted, will the gay and lesbian community feel they have the right to teach young children, none of which originate from gay or lesbian relationships, that homoloveuality is normal and should be taught to little boys and little girls as part of their normal education ?

In another letter, the lesbian writer blames the ruin of the sancbreasty of marriage on the heteroloveuals themselves. There may be some truth to that statement, but it appears that many of todays social programs, especially so-called women's programs have been hijacked by radical feminists, and lesbian feminists based on the total lack of respect for men, fathers and husbands. Normal people would consider it fair to construct a social safety net for men, women and children; take a good look at some of the programs and notice the bias. Is there a connection between the breakdown of the family and liberalization ? Why are is not the government focused on the problem of family breakdown and its great many social and economic costs to the society ?

Many years have gone since Pierre Elliott Trudeau de-criminalized homoloveuality, with a statement that we often hear only half of, "the government does not belong in the bedrooms of the nation, but what happens in public is another story." As the one writer pointed out, the heteroloveual community should re-examine the are affecting the traditional family unit and its breakup including the liberation of divorce laws and crimes of infidelity. The imbalance of justice in Canada over the past 30 years must be re-examined, for as Canada's Justice system has voiced it desire for equality and justice, history will show in black and white, that many of our social programs dealing with family, were corrupted by divisive models polarize the lovees, divide the lovees and family, and do not speak of fathers and mothers, husbands and wives, and children on a level and honest playing field. These social programs were more about dividing the family, and I ask the question why ?

In the debate regarding homoloveuality, we often ignore the arguments that some within the science community suggest that homoloveuality is a disease of the mind, or of the spirit that can be prevented or treated and or as the Supreme Court of Canada has so foolishly noted that the current definition of marriage discriminates. Yes it discriminates on the basis of gender, on the basis of number of individuals, and on the basis of an age parameter. Does the Supreme court of Canada believe their simple observation will convince us that all discrimination is wrong, illegal and unethical, by being silent on this matter. What about pensions for seniors and the disabled ?

Yes Canada must protect its people, including its minorities, but in light of the majority of ll cases of Aids, over 80%, are the result of the homoloveual community, estimated 3% of the population, perhaps it is time that Canada protect homoloveuals from other homoloveuals, by ensuring some rights of partnership.

Canada's duty is not only to protect the minorities from the majority, but also to protect these same minorities from themselves, and not to forget that the majority must be protected from these minorities, especially when it concerns issues that don't concern them, most specifically someone else's children !

As to the first question, is there any evidence to suggest that lesbians have used social programs to attack the traditional family and promote a family unit that excludes fathers and men ?

Caesar J. B. Squitti

The Jesus Christ Code. ©