But "they", if they be real, actually joined One Nation. You restrict your "One Nation toady" branding iron to those who had nowhere near that level of interest or involvment. Why? Other than what I have already postulated, you have remained uncharacteristically silent on that point.
Super Duper Pooper ScooperAfter Steve Relles' computer programming job got outsourced to India - he needed work. So he became the...
Now that I have first-hand experience, courtesy of usenet, of the type of political drones and sociopaths like yourself who flocked to seize the reins of what they perceived as a political bandwaggon on the rise - only to let it go with a vengeance when it failed to acknowledge "them" as its new fuhrer-in-waiting - I would certainly not vote for it again. For a vote for "One Nation" now equates in my mind to a vote for the likes of you and your ilk who hijacked and sank it with your internecine bickering about things of zero concern to the rest of us.
He who relies on the untracability of his aliases now acts astonished that any usenet beginner might fail to untangle them at first glance. Some of us remain more interested in on-topic content than the esoteric arts of newsgroup deception you specialise in.
when he wasn't houseminding for Mark Addinall in WA, etc, etc...
yawn. snip Guava's pathetic idea of the type of on-topic true-blue discussion he expects to hold others permanently in thrall by
