Yes, you are right to say that humans kill. Unconciously humans kill when they breath, walk and when doing a lot other things.
But the killing for the purpose of food is done conciously. Humans recognise that they could only prolong their own lives by ending the lives of others. Humanity had taken the route of mercilessness for its own survival.
The point is what gives humans the right to decide what is a lesser life what is a greater life? What deserve to LIVE and what deserves to DIE.
The very reason that makes humans violent and forceful is the very reason that justfies humanity self propelling itself onto moral high grounds and determine the fate of the other life forms on Earth.
Humanity is a virus that has infected Earth. No other single specie had been known to have caused so many destructions on Earth. And yet you still justify lightly the further killing to be administered by humans upon other species.
Cows are daily molested for their milk, other animals are kept as pets and are molested daily by women and men. More animals are kept, tortured and end as experimental guinea pigs for the purpose of human 'Advancement'!
What kind of intelligent and emotional beings would administer such cruelty onto fellow planetary life forms. Ants and others may be excused, but humans? The most intelligent life form known on Earth is administering huge physical and moral destructions that could be only surpbutted by natural and universal forces.
Again if it is justifiable to captivate, domesticate, molest and kill other species for the purpose of human survival then it is certainly not an universal or natural crime to RAPE for the same purpose of genetical survival of Human DNA!
Those who want to live by a certain code of behaviour are certainly welcomed to do so, but to administer the code on entire Earth is a violation of natural rights. What natural rights have governments have to impose their codes on everyone.
Humanity should only take what it needs. Those who do not want to live by the 'civilised' codes should not be bothered and there have to be a no man's land, a no laws land for them. Of course only those who choose to live by the code of nature should be there voluntarily and the rest could live in the 'civilised world' that should only occupy minimal space on Earth and leave the rest to nature and evolution.
By imposing its code on entire humanity and Earth the 'civilised world' had directly challenged the rule of nature and is on a collision course with natural and universal forces.
We all know what happens when nature does its thing.
RAPE IS NATURAL!
Few bad apples
Charles Martel I challenge you to present figures how many muslim white supremacist Anglo-Celt Americans are there. I'll bet there...
James Henry Graf