King Frog
"Ned Latham" aka King Frog is lying about the author of the "Ned Latham" post! B^D
Ned is an incompetent fool who can't read IP addresses.
Which means he is LYING when he falsely accuses an innocent person of having authored the post he is replying to. B^)
Which means he is blaming the innocent person he has named without a shred of evidence.. and is motivated by MALICE.
It is an apalling slander for Ned Latham to falsely accuse an innocent person of impersonating Ned Latham! B^p
And yet he deliberately repeats the falsehoods, vile slander and his own malice driven invective in serial offences;
This is no simple mistake, Ned Latham has deliberately and systematically undertaken a campaign of false accusation and slander against the person he falsely names as author.
Ned has clearly relapsed into his infamous "Larry Cook" fabrication and slander, where he forged the innocent Larry's name into 428 posts to make it APPEAR that was who he was replying to, and then SLANDERED the innocent victim he had falsely accused, as he does here:
How amusing to see "Ned Latham" arguing with "Ned Latham" over who is the biggest depraved, hypocritical, racist troll; Ned Latham or Ned Latham! B^D
But his attempt to pin the "Ned Latham" posts on an innocent victim who had nothing to do with it is LIES born of Ned's pathological hatred, jealousy and malice
How is it that Ned, who so inappropriately presents himself as a Usenet adjudicator {snicker} can be so deluded? It's all do to his faulty perceptions, as he says himself:
"I deal with people according to my perception of their behaviour."
- Ned Latham
Unfortunately Ned's 'perception' is distorted because Ned is a mental and moral defective, who fabricates, not observes, the behaviour of others!
Remembering the IWW on ANZAC DayLooking for constructive criticism on the emerging leaflet text below. (As it stands it still shows signs of its indymedia origin). Also of course I want to publicize...
