Ned Latham Example 3: Ned has been shown to twist the plain truth, and has admitted doing so below, so his statement above is another lie.
Example 4: Four examples of Ned twisting plain meaning and bare faced lying in two posts is 'often'! ...
Ned now admits that my quote is correct, therfore he he falsified the meaning of the quote, and lied when he callled me a liar.
Example 5:
I posted a valid quote, YOU lied about my Nev quote, without any evidence to support your lie. You were happy to call my ACCURATE quote a lie, when it could have simple been a mistake, but now when I have presented evidence that the quote was true, you object to your 'twisting of my plain meaning' being called a lie.
It is another example of you 'twisting plain meaning, calling my accurate truth a LIE, and your inacurate, untruth a mistake!
Your next next twisting of plain meaning-lie will be to move into the realm of the psychic and claim your 'motive' was pure and mine not, based on no more evidence and with no more truth to it, than all the other lies you have been exposed telling here.
No, you lied about the veracity of the quote I provided.
You are always making 'mistakes', people don't expect anything better of a spamming hypocrite such as you, but it is
Example 6: you falsified THE quote, you falsely claimed I was a liar and you distorted the plain meaning of what Nev said, to something other than what I had accurately quoted.
Example 7: You have tried to defend your serial false statements by claiming they were 'mistakes'. Clearly there are too many for that argument to hold, you deliberately use the word 'lie' and 'liar' whenever you disagree with what is being said, even if it is true, you distort the meaning of both words to slag anyone whose views you object to, and distort the meaning of mistake in trying to apply it to pathological and deliberate slander as in the case of Larry Cook.
Results 1 - 10 of about 418 for "larry cook" author:ned author:latham.
Everyone of those posts was DELIBERATELY fabricated BY YOU to make it look as if you were replying to Larry Cook, who you visciously slandered and then cyberstalked his children.
Which you distorted the plain, and true meaning of when you falsely claimed that the poster of that accurate quote was a 'liar';
You subsequently tried to lie about this clear example of your false statements;
Q.E.D.
Example 7: you twist the plain meaning of the term 'liar', which clearly belongs to those who make deliberately make false statements (418 forgeries attacking Larry Cook is pretty deliberate! B^) and who falsely accuse me of lying when I accurately report Nev's statements.
too easy:
Example 8: Ned twists the plain meaning of 'support' by claiming that if you vote for a party you have not given it your political support!
A supporter is not necessarily the same as a member, Noodle Ned.
Football teams and political parties have many more supporters than they do party members.
Apparently One Nation only had 3 full members, the rest of you dupes were merely fan club-cult followers.
Example 8b: Some people give political support by merely making a donation, others by helping hand out leafelets or how to vote cards, most simply by giving the party they support their vote.
Once again you attempt to impose a rigid idisyncratic and incorrect dogmatism about a term when you are clearly ignorant of it's popular usage and the nuances of it's formal definition
sure it was 11% of the lunatic vote, you and Nev included, at it's peak, but then it's political support waned, and that loss of support was seen at the ballot box.
It's membership remained static at 3.
Yes, they all supported the One Nation Party at the election.
Only 3 were real members, irrespective of how many thought they were.,
Example 9:
I rejected One Nation, as this thread, and google archives show I have been implaccable in opposing their divisive politics. Ned and Nev have both given it their political support.
Ned is twisting the plain meaning of 'rejected' to suggest PHON's subsequent impotent whining and attempted character buttasination of anyone who exposed PHON, and rejected One Nation at the ballot, was rejection BY One Nation.. instead it was rejection OF them! B^D
Many people warned One Nation that their racism would be spurned by the decent and tolerant multicultural mainstream Australians, knowing they were too stupid to heed the warning, and some of them, such as Nev Duguid and Ned Latham are still willing dupes of that disgraceful political cult.
Example 10:
Ned twists the plain meaning of 'sook' to inappropriately apply it to those who predicted the downfall of One Nation, successfully opposed their 'policies' and watched them crushed at the polls! B^D The correct term for their glee is 'gloating' in victory.
"sook" is more aptly applied to Nev Duguid and Ned, who lost their plot to control a.c.t-b as a PHON front, saw the only political party who shared their racist, anti- multicultural bigotry lose political support and be wiped out at the polls, and now busy themselves compiling bilious Vogon slander pomes, and fetid Faux Facks! B^D
Example 11:
Ned has twisted the plain meaning of 'racist' and applied it to the most consistent opponent of the racism in Usenet.
Read any of these and make up your own mind about the authors feelings about racism.
During the racist hysteria against all Lebanese when a gang of viscious pack rapists was constantly being defined in the media by their ethnic origins I ran numerous satirical pieces spoofing the use of such ethnic profiling by racists determined to attack our tolerant multicultural society. I did this by the simple technique of referring to the ethnicity of EVERY criminal! B^) Most of them happened to come from the majority ethnic group, who, surprise suprise, never refer to crimes by their group by specifying ethnicity!
"Asian gangs", "Lebanese gangs", "aboriginal gangs".. sure..
but when the police were pelted with missiles by an "anglo' gang, they were simply viscious hoodlums'.
After identifying the 'anglo paedophiles' and the 'anglo psycho persons' and annoyijng the poo out of White Supremacists and bigots such as Ned, I would point to the systematic attempts to acapegoat ANY ethnic group on the basis of a few criminal members of that group as bogus and racist. It worked well, the racist posts have declined considerably and only the whining Net Kook sooks (Ned and Nev) are still upset enough to bleat interminably and try and misrepresent it as the disease of racism, rather than a satirical vaccination against it.
B^)
Stand back and watch Ned splutter out Example 12! B^D
