Peter Wicks (aka "Che Guava"), posting as "fasgnadh",
Another lunatic rant of lies, misrepresenation and misdirection. Nothing relevant to act-b.
(Guano's forgeries of my attribution lines indone. His forgeries in the body of my post undone too.)
Nothing to say about any of that, you lying amggot?
That's a lie.
That's a lie.
That's a false conclusion.
And a lie.
And zero examples, which is the fact of the matter, is not "often". Thence, your allegation is yet another lie.
Yep. I admit it when I err.
Quite unlike you, ay lunatic?
That's a false conclusion.
And a lie.
Never, liar. I erred in calling you the liar that you are *on the strength* of that particular statement.
BFD. That you are a liar remains a fact.
So you did.
That's a lie.
That's a lie.
Yep. It's consistent with your pathology.
A quote? One that you've abused more times than you can poke a stick at? Wrong again, liar.
Which "plain meaning", lunatic? Your "plain meaning" that 11% of Australians are One Nation supporters?
Of course. I made the mistake of buttuming consistency on your part. Should have checked before calling it a lie.
Wrong again, liar. It was a simple mistake.
LOL. "Inaccurate untruth"?
As opposed to what, lunatic? Are you having another fugue? Do feel free to show something you think might pbutt as an *accurate* untruth, you bumbling bedlamite.
It will?
Gee. I thought all I was doing was contesting lies.
Just as well you've got your psychic (tin) hat on to set me right, ay lunatic?
No need for more, lunatic. The archive's full of it.
Can't get more than 100% of the truth, lunatic.
That's a lie.
Is that you doing your "twisting of plain meaning-lie by moving into the realm of the psychic and claiming your 'motive' was pure and mine not"?
What is it in respect of you, lunatic? Three in the last five years?
Oh dear. I'd better pull my socks up: that's about as many times as you've got something right in respect of me.
Out of *how* many thousands of posts, now?
That's because there's no such animal, lunatic.
Of course. Just like your head.
Wrong again, liar. I did *nothing* to it. I mistook it for a misquote.
Wrong again, liar. I stated the truth: on that occasion for the wrong reason.
Nope. The link between your feeble abuse "PHONie" and the ordinary English term "one Nation supporter" was established long ago.
"Serial": Guanoese for "occasional".
Over the fiveplus-year period of your hate campaign, that would have to mean hundreds (if not thousands) of them.
Care to list and evidence ten, lunatic?
There are four main ways of lying:
1. If you state something as truth knowing it to be false, you are lying; 2. If you state something as truth believing it to be false, you are lying; 3. If you state a fact so as to mislead with it, you are lying; 4. If you state as knowledge something you don't know, you are lying (about your knowledge).
You've been sprung at all of them. Since 3 is about facts and 2 and 4 both allow for the possibility of a statement's being true, your "even if it is true" is true. And it's another example of your lying with type 3: you are stating a fact so as to mislead with it.
That's a lie.
And (surprise, surprise) the mad dog returns to its vomit.
That's a lie.
The only way it it can be accepted as slander is if you accept its statements of your chacacter, descriptions of your behaviour and rebuttals of your lies as accurate. Then, applying them to Larry Cook might be seen as slanderous.
That's a lie.
Nope. Never said boo about the meaning of those words.
You *are* a liar. You're a pathological liar. You lie so often, so stupidly, and sometimes so pointlessly, that it beggars belief.
Nope. Unlike you, I *don't* lie.
You are indeed, Queer, Evil and Demented.
Nope.
Yep.
That is three lies:
1. I didn't attack Larry Cook. The posts in which I misidentified you as Larry Cook were clearly presented as attacks on you and your vile behaviour;
2. Furthermore none of them contained forgeries committed by me. All of the forgeries in them were committed by you;
3. According to you in 2002, the number of such posts was 274, yesterday it was 417, and now it's 418. Can't you make up your mind, you lying maggot?
LOL. It's happened once.
You failed. I said "proof", you bumbling boob.
Nope. I left that to you.
So if a Liberal supporter, having accepted the Don Chipp slogan, votes for the Democrats in protest at Howard's lies, he's suddenly and permanently a Democrat supporter?
I know that, lunatic. Such white ants as Hanchicken, Ross, and Steel made that plain long ago.
Still suffering from those silly delusions about PHON membership, you cretin?
And as support for whom does the disgruntled Liberal supporter's vote count, lunatic?
Nope. That's what you're doing. Even if your special pleading about votes as support is accepted, you still haven't made a case for seeing someone who voted once for some Party as a "supporter" of that Party (OR as a member of it), because "supporter" implies continuity, which a single vote doesn't evidence or even imply.
11% of the entire electorate, you lying maggot. Are you now trying to insinuate that all Australian voters are lunatics?
So we're part of the electorate. So What?
As you yourself point out, most of them now vote otherwise. According to your "logic" therefore, they're *not* One Nation supporters.
Do feel free to give the readership of these groups a bit of a giggle, lunatic...
I want you to try very hard now...
Explain how someone not afflicted with an MPD such as yours can simultaneously be a One Nation Supporter and *not* a One Nation supporter.
Enquiring minds want to know.
That's why you offered them your "advice", is it, lunatic?
So now your deranged dummy spitting is a virtue?
*retch*
That's a lie.
again, lunativ:
Deduced from your own bragging, you mad dog. Live with it.
Translation: many frightened establishment personages and establishment flunkies ran around in circles hysterically bleating "racist!", "racist!"
That is three lies:
1. Multiculturalism isn't decent. It's a pernicious, amoral social engineering doctrine aimed at fracturing the societies of, and tending to balkanize, the countries it gets imposed on;
2. Multiculturalism, like most leftist wanks, is very INtolerant, especially of criticism;
3. PHON weren't spurned. They had more success than the other minor Parties had, and despite the hysterical screeching of those they frightened, they declined only when the major Parties adopted a grab-bag of their policies.
I think it's four lies, actually: that PHON weren't racist either, but I never got interested enough to investigate it.
Can't you for *once* in your life try to be honest about something? Nev might have been sucked in by Beattie, but I am in no way an ALP supporter.
Nope. Just whining crybabies who're *still* spitting the dummy six years after getting their pore widdle feewings hurted.
Australia is NOT in asia 4178The Enlightenment So according to Blowhardx and his racist theory, Australia WAS a nation ('UNIQUE ethnic and racial character' UNTIL the Europeans arrived. By the same logic...
Gloating over your imagined victories is certainly one of your characteristics. It's typical of the graceless responses of chronic losers.
More projection from the only person who ever tried to control it.
The Lebanese aren't a race, lunatic. Their Islamist *culture* is what's obnoxious about them.
They were the racists, you lying, weaselling toad. They were selecting their victims on ethnic grounds.
Cultural "profiling", liar.
That's a lie. Our society isn't tolerant of criticism of your filthy Multikultur, for one thing.
That's a lie:
"NRL gang rapes and Anglo paedophiles"
Where's your reference to the ethnicity of those you allege are NRL gang rapists, liar?
Then there's:
"a brain-dead Anglo f***wit like you"
Where's the criminal, you lying maggot?
It's not anly a direct lie, as the above evidences, it's an indirect lie too. The lunatic harped on and on about persons arrested in Australia on terrorism-related charges as being "anglo", trying to obscure the *relevant* point about them; ie, that they were Muslim.
Then by what telepathic process do you determine that they're "anglo", lunatic?
You make the allegation, liar, but you don't substantiate it.
Completely ignoring, in his rabid white-anting of Oz, the fact that *culture*, not ethnicity, was the issue. As exmplified, for example,
Satire, you rabid, hate-mongering lunatic?
Of course. You've almost completely stopped posting your racist poo.
Got nothing to do with my exposure of your racism, of course, ay lunatic?
Aw. Pore widdle sook. Can't you do better than Stupid Troll Trick 2a, lunatic?
Phew! All sounds sort of plausible 'til one looks at it against your actual behaviour. Do feel free to to have another go at weaselling away your attempt to insinuate that paedophilism is a strictly anglo perversion, lunatic:
"Of course, recent cultural influences, especially American loveual infantilism has seen a dramatic rise in anglo persons, and even mature women seek to look like little girls to satisfy the warped Anglo apebreastes".
---snip---
The message you followed up wasn't posted into act-b, troll. So why did you post it into act-b, troll?
Oh, that's right, you're a troll.
pee off, you depraved, hypocritical, racist troll.
Ned -- Fingerprint: D17C FDD5 BBA8 8687 42E3 C8F2 C9FB 0314 E17A 0CD7
