Unions say that the bumper half-year profit announced by Qantas proves there is no justification for moving any of the Australian carrier's workforce offshore.
NASA topper' Saurabh has no proofSharat Pradhan in Lucknow February 26, 2005 09:42 IST Saurabh Singh, who is at the epicenter of the raging controversy over a NASA award, has...
The company reported a 28 per cent lift in first half net profit to $458.4 million, beating market expectations of a profit around $430.5 million.
The airline's chief executive officer Geoff Dixon also took aim at the union representing flight attendants, while defending the airline's staff conditions.
"We provide very, very good conditions in this company, we provide - for this industry - relatively secure employment, we provide and are spending billions of dollars on giving our people the best equipment," Mr Dixon said.
China, India rival U.S., new survey finds2005-2-26 By Rachel Konrad SAN FRANCISCO, AP China and India rival the United States when it comes to business compebreastiveness, and the Asian countries may soon surpbutt American rivals in technological innovation, according to a...
The Flight Attendants buttociation of Australia (FAAA) was not representing its members effectively, he said.
"I think this group of people are appallingly led - I think the FAAA, who every time we even say hello to them say we'll strike, are really derelict in how they represent their people." AdvertisementAdvertisement
But FAAA secretary Michael Mijatov defended the union.
Lifescience jobs flowing abroad, tooBy Andrew Pollack The New York Times February 25, 2005 Bala S. Manian rarely looked back after he left India to attend graduate school in the United States. Since 1979...
"Poor old Geoff, he's probably still smarting over the fact that we had the temerity to publicly criticise his actions about destroying Australian jobs," Mr Mijatov said.
He denied the union threatened strikes at the drop of a hat.
"Once they (Qantas) took a realistic position over the (enterprise bargaining agreement) negotiations we were able to conclude an agreement without striking.
"We're not a militant union, it's just that we're one of the few Qantas unions that actually dares to question, criticise and embarrbutt them publicly for good reason when it comes to their manic desire to destroy Australian jobs," Mr Mijatov said.
Mr Dixon said Qantas had a track record of growing jobs in Australia, but the compebreastive industry in which it operated meant some supplies and staff would in future have to be sourced overseas.
Of the company's 35,000 full time staff, 95 per cent were in Australia.
Mr Dixon denied the company was planning to shift more than 7,000 jobs overseas.
"We will source some of our supplies and people offshore but always, always thinking we are an Australian airline," he said.
Qantas will this month open a new cabin crew base in London with more than 400 Europe-based flight attendants, including about 200 Australians.
But unions blasted the carrier, calling on the airline to show its commitment to Australian workers by keeping their jobs safe.
"It's a very solid profit result and it reinforces there's absolutely no justification for Qantas risking its solid maintenance record by outsourcing any jobs overseas," Australian Manufacturing Workers Union (AMWU) NSW buttistant secretary Tim Ayres said.
The AMWU represents about 1,500 maintenance and engineering staff at Qantas.
Australian Services Union (ASU) buttistant national secretary Linda White said it was unclear which jobs would be outsourced.
"The reality is they've made so much more money this year by keeping it in Australia, it's just been going bigger and better," she said.
