Oh well, I guess I'll have to marry one of these hags" 587

If YOU wnat a discussion, then drop the misandristic claptrap.

Tough poo. I have a low tolerance for cowpoo and misandry. Display either, and you will get it from both barrels.

" You're a liberated woman. Learn to *lose* ! " Danny DeVito, " Other People's Money "

Who cares ? Its NOT about *you*. Deal with that.

The commonality of " partnering ", is connected with the commonality of the disposable marriage, and both are products of the marriage-phobia of Feminists and Feminism.

Indeed, so its NOT a " partnership ", thus using that term for romantic relationships is doubly retarded.

Straw Woman Alert. I have no problem with one party leaving.

But, if we're going to apply normal contract law, and precedents to this area, then the party with NO valid contractual reason to leave, MUST positively indemnify the other, dumped, party.

" The plural ( Or, singular ) of 'anecdote' is NOT 'citation'. "

Unless you want to parade around your gross and narcissistic *ignorance* of the state of divorce, as a mbutt phenomenon, you should *first* study up on the topic. A good starter point would be Sanford Braver's " Divorced Dads; Shattering The Myths ". A good followup would be Judith Wallerstein's " The Unexpected Legacy Of Divorce; A 25 Year Landmark Study ". For an example of how badly divorce often does treat men, for being men, Wendy Dennis' " The Divorce From Hell " would punch through the rose covered view that you are presently espousing.

Facts. Other people. Ststistics with proofs. All those trump tales of one, out of a billion...

Happiness is not to be valued over *truth*. Those who make that MS-take, only show their ability to lie, even to themselves.

That is a contemptable vice.

Do get help for your control issues. You buttume that I have none of those things. That is another *ignorant* MS-take of bigoted, and intolerant narcissism.

Andre