Australian proposed the decisions more choice
Ummmmm.....transparency for one
THANK YOU MR WALKERThank you Mr Walker to bring back the issue of the Promised Royal Inquiry on the Newmont Newcrest BHP and...
Because the government will incorporate these groups and they effectively become part of the "government", you are not ridding of government per say, just representing it differently.
Taxes you would not eliminate by farming out responsilibilty and control.
Not true. They are very effective and efficient when it comes to looking after the interests they serve.
Well if it were as you state I wouldn't have the same quarm, but for example the proposed pharmaceuticals ruling body, with US pharmaceutical commercial interests heavily represented in that body, who grant the final say in what medicines can be made as a generic brand and what is included or excluded from our Austrlalian PBS system to me totally contradicts your projection that "Market forces and consumer choice will dictate where our money goes"
See above. Here is but one example that they are playing a different game to the one you envisage.
Good suggestion............and an even better one there. But, down the hall in the 1st waiting room, aren't the interchange waiting to take their place? What then?
Really? Please explain it to me, I still see a different picture.
REPLY TO MR PARKERDear Mr Parker, I would strongly advise you to carefully visit the internet site of Dr Don Findlay and read the book of President Bob Sheppard on the subject of the Discovery...
*life* is interesting, where would you be without it?
