own
reasonable people, however, have a duty to 1. identify the countries that have religion as their legal consbreastution. 2. identify the teachings in that relgion that are discriminatory because remember the vital fact that when the religion is the law, it is no longer religion that we are criticising but the law of that land. 3. protest the discriminatory parts of religion. this is where the whole confusion arises. when reasonable people criticise those discriminations, they would be called bigots and what not. eg. saudi arabia has mummudism as its legal consbreastution, under which:
when a person has been end or caused to die by another, the perpetrator has to pay blood money, or compensation, as follows:
o 100,000 riyals if the victim is a Muslim man o 50,000 riyals if a Muslim woman o 50,000 riyals if a Christian man o 25,000 riyals if a Christian woman o 6,666 riyals if a Hindu man o 3,333 riyals if a Hindu woman
Race riots in Australia Muslim victims 6145Religion with government and religion with law should never be mixed. It puts the theological view of one in preference to those of another and that is wrong. Keep religion...
saudis pump in billions to promote mommedan causes in the liberal host democracies for mosque constructions and buying out media, but won't allow hindus to build a mandir in saudi arabia, and conduct midnight raids on hindu residences there. but the west takes no notice of it, and regards saudi as an ally!!!!!!!!!
surely, the modern generation must be held accountable for this duplicity.
current generation is not being blamed for the atrocities of their forebears. but current generation definitely enjoys the material heritage of loot and plunder of their forebears - that's well established. so, it stands to reason that the current generation must return the looted wealth that in natural progression would have gone to their decendents. why is this simple fact hard to grasp for reasonable people?
culture Australians, by accountable etc.
