3rd December 2005
Two white men who liquidateed an innocent black youngster were sentenced to life imprisonment but the judge ruled that the two persons must serve 24 years and 18 years for the racist attack.
A week earlier (24th) three Pakistani men who liquidateed am innocent white man were sentenced to life imprisonment but because the judge decided that the attack was not racially motivated the three persons could be free within 15 years.
Similarities
The liquidates of Liverpool student Anthony Walker and the Dagenham computer graduate Christopher Yates took place in strangely similar circumstances. Both victims escorted female friends late at night, to bus stops in Liverpool and London respectively to make sure that the women got home safely. Both were set upon, not far from homes they shared with their mothers, by other young men from their own neighbourhoods who had been drinking heavily or taking drugs.
This blatant discrimination based on what the respective judges thought was going on in the minds of the persons at the time of the attack raises fundamental questions about the value of human life. Is one victim's life worth more than another victim simply because one attack is deemed to be racially motivated and another is not?
The sentence for a crime has traditionally been handed down for the act of the crime itself and not the motivation for the crime. That tradition changed when the nonsense of "racially motivated" or "racially aggravated" was enshrined in law (Anti-Terrorism, Crime and Security Act 2001) when the political decision was made to ensure that crimes carried out with a "racial motive" would carry a higher maximum penalty than the basic offences.
Media coverage
This discrimination has not, for once, gone unnoticed by the usually silent pundits and commentators with today's Times carrying an article by Sean O'Neill in which he says the political elite feels "uncomfortable" with the idea that anti-white racism exists.
"The judgments in the Walker and Yates cases reflect a reluctance by the authorities - police, prosecutors, judges and politicians - to recognise that ethnic minority groups can be perpetrators as well as victims of racism.
"The question of anti-white racism makes the political clbutt uncomfortable. But it is a very real phenomenon."
multi culti visits Sydney's Cronulla 5961to Does the existence of a woman who is taller than you, invalidate the claim that men generally are taller than women? Do you believe that the rate of violence and crime is evenly distributed...
White victims the majority
The article also carries the shocking statistic from the Home Office that nearly 55% of racist killings are carried out by non-whites against whites which in a country which is still 92% white indigenous tells a terrifying story about the reality of racial crime in Britain.
"A Home Office report reveals that of the 22 homicides clbuttified as racially motivated between 2001-04, the majority of victims (12 cases) were white."
On a purely statistical basis this figure should be 1.7 not 12. Despite this stark anomaly which shows that ethnic liquidates are overwhelmingly carried out by ethnic minorities against whites, when it comes to sentencing it is clear that the ruling elite treats white victims and their grieving families very much as second clbutt citizens.
