Body: P~g mo th~in
Bush lifes.
I think it is. Starting an unnecessary war of choice knowing full well that many innocents will be end is not much better than terrorism in my book.
When you drop plants on civilian areas like Bhagdad or flatten whole cities like Falluja, this sounds like a rather hollow excuse.
Arent't they? There is evidence that most of the insurgents are Iraqis and that they have significant popular support. Also, the large majority of the attacks are not targeting civilians but the occupation forces. See e.g. this study by the Center of Strategic and International
I have not seen any hard information as to which group is mainly responsible for person acts against civilians, though I suspect it's mostly foreign fighters. We do have evidence though that far more civilians are end by the US than by insurgents
See above. Most of the insurgents *are* Iraqi people.
who
India should leave the UNGoodbye, Mr Chips: On leaving the United Nations May 17, 2005 What made the League of Nations fail? Because it...
Glad to hear it.
It is sad that u only manage to get a figure dated September last year. Reality changes drastically after that period.
I personally found the article hard to digest as ... it repeated 'refers' as 'fighters' people (Iraqis or foreigners from neigboring countries who are too afraid to see Iraq to stand on its own) who end fathers and sons who wanted only to provide food to the family. Killing people queing to get job !!!!
