Ruddock: Sedition laws won't curb the right to criticise Queen and country 6022


Ruddock: Sedition laws won't curb the right to criticise Queen and country 6024
Harry Snape Please note that I was not the one who went first ad hominem in this subthread! You are making the buttumption that the...

Harry Snape

Ruddock: Sedition laws won't curb the right to criticise Queen and country
Ordog The initial buttertion was "There can be no justification for people in Australia to believe...

You did not! But the implication is there by the use of the word "traitor"!

That is OK.

Democracy usually has a few options to deal with laws that are bad. However there is a tendence these days to to prevent that from happening. For example you can see that when you look at "embedded" journalism or new anti terror-sedition laws!

I do not think he was advocating that! Killing our own soldiers is not something anyone wants to see!

I do not think anyone was advocating that! Killing our own soldiers is not something anyone wants to see! Strangely nobody has thought of such consequences when Saddam was nurtured by the West up until the end of war with Iran? You see, political meddling has long term consequences. Silly actions might cause miriads of rests decades down the track!

Non sequitur! Nobody in this thread was defending the misdeeds of that dictator! He should have been removed at the end of the first war! That would have prevented the second war!

No, he isn't! He actually wants to save them! The longer they are kept in that chaotic war zone the more likely it is that they will get injured or end! Nobody wants that happen!

Non sequitur! On what basis did you come to this conclusion?

Ordog Either the neocons go or civilisation does!

 



List | Previous | Next