School parents beware 3828

EnjoyDialup

I'll let you work it out yourself, since you have become hysterical.

This teacher told 2 primary school clbuttes, and not simply the students who may have queried her as to who the woman picking her up was.

They are words that your own article stated, and you've forgotten them. Thats what being hysterical will do for you.

So we agree, that this teacher was out of line.

And when have I stated otherwise. Can you read ?

Well, not only did you fail on that count, you also made yourself look like a twit in the process. 8 year old girls do not become pregnant.

It all depends on the information, does it not ?

And there you go again, stepping from a child, to a teenager to give your argument credibility.

You are not going to win anything with side stepping around everything you claim, once it's put back to you in the corect context it should be in.

It did NOT lack an age, the age in question was 8 year olds. And you said "Good idea. Lets wait until after they are pregnant to tell them!"

If you are going to lie so blatantly, you shoiuld at least cover your tracks a bit better - ie; dont leave them in the same post.

The entire subject is about an 8 year old girl, whos mummies wrote a book to explain to other 8 year olds the 'facts' about lesbian relationships.

I stated that 8 years old is no age for the nature of ANY loveual relationship to be discussed.

You then came along and said "Good idea. Lets wait until after they are pregnant to tell them!"

Youre continual attempts at detracting the topic to confuse and deny it, are laughable.

Whats wrong with the parents do this ?

So what ? That has nothing to do with the subject.

So what ? That has nothing to do with the subject.

So what ? That has nothing to do with the subject.

You dont seem to get what this thread is about...

As *I* have suggested ? It is *YOU*, you profound fool, who has posted URL's to PROVE this fallacy to me.

Since when has it become *MY* suggestion ?

Where are you going with all this redundant information ?

No, you came up with the "girls reaching puberty younger than before" angle.

I simply said that 8 years old is too young for the nature of ANY loveual relationshiop to be discussed.

You spouted some claptrap about waiting till they get pregnant to tell them, to which I replied How many 8 year olds are getting pregnant.

*YOU* then proceeded to provide URL's which stated that girls as younmg as 6 are reaching puberty.

Do try and keep up, this is becoming very tedious.

So first you use this as reason to justify your stance, and now it's cause to deny what I say. You are losing ground faster than Banda Aceh on boxing day.

And now you claim to have posted the links again. At least you are consistently inconsistent.

So, how many 8 year olds are becoming pregnant ?

So what ? That has nothing to do with the subject.

And did they also tell you about lesbian relationships ?

That is not the point. Do her mums perform love acts in front of her ?

Not the way the poofters on parade go about it.

So what ? That has nothing to do with the subject.

So what ? That has nothing to do with the subject.

Stop lieing. You are the one who decided to detract the subject with younger and younger ages. The AGE in question was 8 years old.

The girl is 8 years old.

Backpeddling now ? A sure sign you are lost.

Let me refresh your memory - "I wanted to quantify the original statement that lacked an age."

You have repeatedly lied and become hysterically confused.