School parents beware 3849

----snip----

Wrong. "Public opinion" is what the ruling clbuttes and their minions can get away with pretending is a consensus of opinion. *They* define it, not the public.

And quit the evasion. Are they, or are they not, lewdly displaying their genitals on a crowded city street?

----snip----

You did, when you said "road", and not "street". Whether the strawman law you're babbling about says it or not, the buttumption is that no enclosed toilet facility is available. That doesn't apply in built-up areas.

How would you know? You said above that you "believe" the straw man law you're babbling about exists.

Practice what you preach, hypocrite.

And quit the evasions. Discreetely peeing against the nearside wheel of a cart on a lonely country road is *nothing like* brazenly brandishing your balls at people in a crowded city street.

You really are as thick as two short planks, aren't you? FYI, idiot, I don't give a poo about the poofter parade: I'm just contesting the lies and bullpoo you homophiles are pushing down everyone's throat.

Now address the point, you slimy weasel:

Films are rated. Those including loveual activity are rated for keeping children *out* of the cinemas displaying them. It's actually a *crime* to involve prepubescent children in such behaviour in films as went on in the poofter parade.

----snip----

It must be very comforting to believe that.

Then try to do so, instead of weaselling and evading.

----sni-----

More evasion. I gave you a counter-example to your idiotic notion that things get stopped because they're bad.

No. But they do what their bosses tell them.

Irrelevant. When was the last time you heard them say anything about carcinogenic additives in petrol?

Your sarcasm is pathetic. The poofter parade is a PC event, which makes it safe for them to air, and anything with a loveual air about it's a ratings booster.

1. There was no public outcry. It was all the politicians and the press.

2. There is nothing bad about such weapons.

That is not a ban in the sense we were discussing.

And there's nothing intrinsically "bad" about such a dam anyway.

There was no public outcry. (Though there might have been one if the gummint had been slow to act.)

And there's nothing intrinsically "bad" about timed local calls.

You demonstrated your idiocy. None of your examples illustrates your "point".

You are an idiot.

First, prove that your alleged homophobia even exists.

Second, see if you can work out why it is that the only time we ever hear from your alleged "homophobics" is in response to the noise created by the homoes and-or their supporters.

No. It's a challenge. You allege that I'm an alarmist. *You* get to back that allegation up or retract it.

But being the weasel that you are, you'll do neither.

Ned -- Fingerprint: D17C FDD5 BBA8 8687 42E3 C8F2 C9FB 0314 E17A 0CD7