geoffw
So long as your local compebreastion don't have access to shorter recruitiment cycles you will not be at a disadvantage. In anycase the managment have lost the abillity or interest in creating a silled and dedicated a workforce and have forgotten how.
I recall one of the older companies I worked for once. One of the gravest insults was the accusation that you had not groomed anyone into managment capable of taking on the roll.
A fatefully flawed decision that has decoupled business from a natural connection with what will make it succede.
No. Howard like all the deceptive morons before him have been comming up with the same excuse over and over again.
I can't be nice to him. He is treating us as gullible. We mustn't accept this from him.
The idea that Australia can;t sustain its economy without very large immigration inflows is rediculous.
No harm will ensue to Australians if we do not increase the immigration rate: all that will happen is that we retard the expansion plans of some minearls companies (mostly multinational companies with minimal to zero local commitments to community or shareholders). A 'skills shortage' will encourage those companies to slightly increase wages and to put in place adaquete training.
The term 'skills shortage' is a weasel word. Its a term to convert 'high wages' into a negative connotation.
Exacly!
Let them have a problem of a skills and labour shortage.
It is a beautifull problem for the people of a country to have.
I expect an "it told you so".
I expect you're right.
