Talking of Desecration ... 3171Non-sequitur? Try reading the subject line of this thread - "Talking of Desecration ..." Then you haven't been paying attention. Bush has been pushing for human rights reforms in Saudi Arabia since he first...
George, you can read, but you don't comprehend even the clearest of statements. You just go off writing anything at all. This is getting tedious. Try reading what is above again, this time with brain engaged. Then you'll realise how idiotic a non sequitur what you just said is.
Another vacuous statement. If you were in either of those places right now, I guarantee you wouldn't be insisting on every one of your rights, so I know where the hypocrisy lies.... I don't see George Bush or Rumsfeld insisting on them when they go there either! What in hell do you imagine would be accomplished by that, apart from your own incarceration or worse? There are better ways to change people's minds than openly confront them. It's not cowardice, it's common sense.
I am certainly prepared to die for them, but not in some pointless scenario you are staging! By the same argument, and regardless of your advanced age, you should be on a plane tomorrow to hit the streets of Riyyadh waving a bible - not even because you may or may not be a Christian but because your human right to do so is being violated. Why won't you do that, George? (We won't mention the word 'hypocrite' now - though at least you now know how to spell it.)
Bimbos don't get Ph Ds and become Secretary of State. Do your own research, you lazy sod. Here are some Google keywords:
"Condoleeza Rice" american failure
Oh, you won't bother. Here. Read it carefully.
Inane comment. You are doing more and more of it in your postings.
Nope. I already explained how it is people like you who promote terrorism by your prejudices and ignorant beliefs.
Rifty -- Academic and Computing Help
