lynx
Well, he would say that, wouldn't he? He's biased.
The facts are that they don't have any weapon, not a plant, not plant making equipment, not a factory, nothing. They don't have a target. They don't have a plan.
A LAWYER!!! And the PROSECUTOR at that:
He would say that... he's a lawyer (liar).
Of course he's got no evidence that they are committed to ANY cause... and CHEMICALS??? Fertilizer?? Bleach??? You can find it in any Australian household... are we ALL persons?
Keelty is mouthing whatever the fedgov tells him these days... he won't make the mistake of independent thinking.... and risking the bashing from the fedgov he got for suggesting that our illegal invasion of Iraq increased our risk of terrorism... he's now learnt to only mouth what Howard wants him to say.
Bullpoo. There's no preventing a determined attack...
What we have here is a show trial... put together to keep terrorism in the news... for the politicians to remove our freedom with yet more draconian police powers.
There are no facts... just bullpoo..
When you can show:
a) a target
Aussie farmers driven out of business by imports 1583When the new industrial relations laws were introduced what did the National Farmers' Federation do? They cheered. They cheered the reduction in working conditions. They cheered the reduced wages. They cheered the...
b) an actual plant or other method
c) an actual plot, rather than a few blokes enjoying paintball..
Then I'll take you seriously.
It was reported... and dismissed. When you have:
a) a target
b) an actual plant or other method
c) an actual plot
Then I'll take you seriously.
Perhaps if you didn't believe everything your government tells you, without checking if there are any facts behind their pronouncements then you may avoid these embarrbutting disclosures about "persons in our midst".
It's the "Communists" scare all over again, but people like you don't learn from history.
-- Regards,
Gregory. "Ding-a-ding-dang,My Dang-a-long ling-long"
