Ned Latham
He asked a question, you couldn't answer and impugned his motives in asking it, and tried to shift the discussion from THE ISSUE, to your ad hom attack on the posters MOTIVES.
Ned and Nev invariably try to shift from VERIFIABLE ISSUES, where facts count and can be rationally disputed, to THEIR buttUMPTIONS ABOUT INTANGIBLES, eg their mind reading and projection about MOTIVES, where no factual proof is related and they can simply fabricate till they run out of slander ad hom and fantasy.
...
You never answer if you can weasel away, avoid the issue, or character buttasinate the poster.
It's all he has going to hang his hat on, - weasel words! B^D
Ask Ned why he won't use plain english for societies which have multiple cultures (multicultural).
Ned "Humpty Dumpty" Latham likes to define words to mean what HE wants to them mean, not what you, I, the dictionaries or common usage say their plain meaning is.
Ask Ned why he despises our tolerant democratic multicultural society, and prefers Greece at the time of the Spartan Oligarchy when women and slaves had no franchise?
GUANTANAMO BAY:ICON OF LAWLESSNESSAIAUSFEB05 Bodyfwd 22-Mar-2005 AMNESTY INTERNATIONAL AUSTRALIA HUMAN RIGHTS AND SECURITY www.amnesty.org.au-whatshappening-CounterTerrorism GUANTANAMO BAY: ICON OF LAWLESSNESS Hundreds of detainees from around 40 countries remain in legal limbo in the US naval...
Whenever Ned is cornered in logical debate, he simply redefines words idiosyncratically and declares anyone who holds him to common usage and plain meaning to be a 'liar'! B^D
Ned can't explain it. He never has been able to.
Ned doesn't really understand true blue, and the idea a simple, plain language scetch can be given, as I did, terrifies NEd because he is not confident he wouldn't fall flat on his face again.
He prefers you to wade through pages of his interminable Vogon prose, anti-multicultural diatribe, and his obsessional ranting which he laughingly calls FAQ's and plants in the rotting corpse of the the old One Nation Faux FarQ! B^D
Or stick your privates in a blender if you would like less pain and more enlightenment! B^D
I have already summarized the key values and attributes of Fair Dinkum true blues.. you will just have to accept Ned and Nev's feeble admission that they can't say, don't know, and would you like a copy of their WatchTower! B^D
Ned has ensured he is the most killfiled person in Usenet, If I didn't take his posts out of the trash and unpleasant woman slap him occasionally he might go unread altogether.
But I regard Ned and Nev as vital test subjects for medical experiments, and so much fun to goad.
It's guilt free, because they are too thich to know when they have been intellectually and morally eviscerated with the scalpel of truth. ;-)
Because it's simply more layers of tripe where Ned quotes Ned saying Ned is right about Ned on everything.
You are a f***ing joke.. and to watch you demand that people read through endless piles of irrelevant turgit poo, wrapped around a feeble skeleton of prejudice and bigotry and covered in a thin skin of delusion and paranoia.. when all they have done is ask you a simple questionj to which you can't give a straight answer, ..is a complete f***in RIOT! B^D B^D
So when did you stop beeating your wife?
Why would anyone, when you had evaded his simple question on the CENTRAL ISSUE of discussion "What is true blue?" respond to your arrogant and slanderous loaded rhetoric which weasels away deom rational discussion OF THE TOPIC, and tries to swim into the poostream of your slander and ad hom.
Ned has an obsession with excrement. He writes Vogon verse about it, and has even published his auto-biographical details in one of his "FAQ's" called "Guano"!! 8^o I kid you not! B^D
Ned swims in and talks and is frequently told to eat, ..poo. ;-)
So there you have the Complete Lifecycle of one of NEd's Troll responses.
1. You ask a question 2. a variety of people answer attempting to address your Q. 3. Various discussions bloom about the relative merits of answers.. 4. Usenet discussion is occurring on the topic you iniated, among those interested. (presumably those not interested or incapable of contribution ignore the thread and shut the f*** up)
5. Ned questions your right to ask a question in the NG the lunatic regards as his Private Domain. He does so in breach of the charter. 6. Ned avoids any meaningfulo answer to any of your questions, 7. Ned impugns and maligns your motives in even asking it (any questions which threaten Ned's fragile fantasy construct result in such rabid hysterical attacks) 8. Ned employs loaded rhetorical questions as his primary method of discourse. This enables him to remain a small target, gives him maximum deniability, minimum exposure, and to INSINUATE his slander. 9. When you ignore his rhetorical loaded character buttasinating insinuations Ned brands YOU a troll for not answering his OFF topic questions, ignoring the fact that he initiated the discussion with you by ignoring YOUR on-charter issues and subsbreastuting his own obsessions.
Once you recognise his pattern and methods he's a sitting duck. ;-)
Nev, on the other hand, operated only in bipolar mode, equal mixtures of blatehring incomprehensible indignation and Broken Winged Bird, where he attempts to destract from each exposure and ridicule of some ridiculous nonsense by doing and even more ridiculous song and dance.. this can escalate through many iterations till you get tired of pushing his Squark button. B^)