You haven't answered the one main question that could also make up her defence quite readily and that is with baggage labels. It seems quite obviously that youhaven't travelled very much at all.
The Truth about Corby 2913And at the same time, no one really know if she is attempting to hide some of the evidence as that certain evidence such as her marriage to the Japanese and her...
All check-in luggage contains a baggage label when the baggage is weighed at the airport. The baggage label is constructed by a printable plastic (once printed, the ink is permanent and seeps into the plastic) and has a extremely hard to take off without showing tamper marks. The baggage label contains a number of main information.
The total amount of luggage checked in by the pbuttenger The total weight of the luggage The pbuttenger's name The ticket number The 3-code airport destination it is to go to The rest are barcodes etc.
Two main pieces of evidence that could have refuted the entire situation is the total weight of the baggage and that could have been easy done by weighing the total baggage where if she was innocent the total weight would have been approximately 4 kilograms over the baggage labels.
Why didn't she use that defence but instead of playing CSI with fingerprints etc.
No one has been able to answer that question and that includes you.
Bullpoo.
If that is correct for Schapelle, then all drug couriers will state the same to get off and that's bullpoo.
You don't know that she is innocent nor do I know that she is guilty but there are some sever questions about Schapelle that are also surfacing towards the end of the trial and I wonder just why they were kept in the closet.
