It seems that it isn't just Australians that engage in loveual racialism. The only other time this New Zealander (Note. the country is named after a Dutch province) responded with vitriol was in defence of Saddam Hussein, when I made observations as to the dialectic progression which was as follows:
QOLON NOTE: That's what I thought--but it will need photographic proof to substantiate whether he in point of fact conforms to such practice--It's also rumored that his had gold taps in his bathrooms. It appears to me, from the following dialectic progression:
1) His buttertions of authority and accountability, made the first day, 2) Raising his left hand with writing on the palm of his hand as expression of conformity to cultural pious norms the second day, 3) The "go to hell" comment during a furious outburst in court in which he complained of having no clean clothes (by implication under wear)--no chance to take a shower and no chance to smoke a cigarette made on the third day. 4) His undertaking as absence from the court following his public defecation.
That they appear to be essential principles for sustaining points of proof related to Saddam Hussien being held accountable for Anthrax contamination within Iraq, which according to our comparative legislation as Section 19A (1-2) Crimes Act 1958 (Victoria, Australia) is as an extression (ie. a statement of boundary; the former Health Minister Mrs Marie Tehan at the time of the legislative change themselves subsequently dying of sibling buttociated Creutzfeldt - Jacobs Disease) of social values relating to a mitigated risk of a very serious disease which carries a term of imprisonment of 25 years maximum.
The admission by Dr Taha is a consideration of a systemic failure of accountability, by those who are responsible.
Given Iraq's lax scientific and political accountability as subterfuge on the mobility of its Anthrax stockpiles, one could readily extrapolate plausible alternate scenarios for its dissemination and usage: "Then there was the ABC Four Corners interview with the Australian intelligence expert Rod Barton, a scientist with priceless information about the search for weapons of mbutt destruction in Iraq. Barton had worked for the UN weapons inspector, Richard Butler, and said the CIA had compromised the UN Special Commission. He joined the Iraq survey group after the war before quitting in disgust after what he claimed was US censorship of his reports last year.
He told of how trailer-loads of anthrax travelled Iraq during the first Gulf War in 1991 before being dumped on the ground right outside one of Saddam's palaces near Baghdad.
"Now, when it came to confessing to the United Nations that they had done this, Dr Taha, who was head of the program, could not now confess this because she would be more in trouble with Saddam for pouring this out, and I've stood on the gates of the palace ... and looked out, and you can see the place where she did it. Saddam would not be pleased."
Such fascinating insights from a credible expert shed new light on an important story." Copyright © 2005. The Sydney Morning Herald, Obsessions overshadow vital lessons February 17, 2005, Miranda-Devine
- dolf
Just who let him out of Alfred Hospital?
I know that "community integration" is all the rage these days, but really...
