A list of UN Resolutions against "Israel" Here is a list of UN resolutions that Israel has not complied with, far more than Iraq. Note that she has also illegally developed nuclear weapons. Further, the situation is far worse than would at first appear, it involves the serious distortion of the official Security Council record by the profligate use by the United States of its veto power. (See Table) Israel's, defiance goes back to its very beginnings. This collection of resolutions criticizing Israel is unmatched by the record of any other nation as Israel stands in violation of more UN resolutions than ANY OTHER NATION ON EARTH.
A list of UN Resolutions against "Israel" 1955-1992: * Resolution 106: " . . . 'condemns' Israel for Gaza raid". * Resolution 111: " . . . 'condemns' Israel for raid on Syria that end fifty-six people". * Resolution 127: " . . . 'recommends' Israel suspends it's 'no-man's zone' in Jerusalem". * Resolution 162: " . . . 'urges' Israel to comply with UN decisions". * Resolution 171: " . . . determines flagrant violations' by Israel in its attack on Syria". Resolution 228: " . . . 'censures' Israel for its attack on Samu in the West Bank, then under Jordanian control". * Resolution 237: " . . . 'urges' Israel to allow return of new 1967 Palestinian refugees". Resolution 248: " . . . 'condemns' Israel for its mbuttive attack on Karameh in Jordan". * Resolution 250: " . . . 'calls' on Israel to refrain from holding military parade in Jerusalem". * Resolution 251: " . . . 'deeply deplores' Israeli military parade in Jerusalem in defiance of Resolution 250". * Resolution 252: " . . . 'declares invalid' Israel's acts to unify Jerusalem as Jewish capital". * Resolution 256: " . . . 'condemns' Israeli raids on Jordan as 'flagrant violation". * Resolution 259: " . . . 'deplores' Israel's refusal to accept UN mission to probe occupation". * Resolution 262: " . . . 'condemns' Israel for attack on Beirut airport". * Resolution 265: " . . . 'condemns' Israel for air attacks for Salt in Jordan". * Resolution 267: " . . . 'censures' Israel for administrative acts to change the status of Jerusalem". * Resolution 270: " . . . 'condemns' Israel for air attacks on villages in southern Lebanon". * Resolution 271: " . . . 'condemns' Israel's failure to obey UN resolutions on Jerusalem". * Resolution 279: " . . . 'demands' withdrawal of Israeli forces from Lebanon". * Resolution 280: " . . . 'condemns' Israeli's attacks against Lebanon". * Resolution 285: " . . . 'demands' immediate Israeli withdrawal form Lebanon". * Resolution 298: " . . . 'deplores' Israel's changing of the status of Jerusalem". * Resolution 313: " . . . 'demands' that Israel stop attacks against Lebanon". * Resolution 316: " . . . 'condemns' Israel for repeated attacks on Lebanon". * Resolution 317: " . . . 'deplores' Israel's refusal to release Arabs abducted in Lebanon". * Resolution 332: " . . . 'condemns' Israel's repeated attacks against Lebanon". * Resolution 337: " . . . 'condemns' Israel for violating Lebanon's sovereignty". * Resolution 347: " . . . 'condemns' Israeli attacks on Lebanon". * Resolution 425: " . . . 'calls' on Israel to withdraw its forces from Lebanon". * Resolution 427: " . . . 'calls' on Israel to complete its withdrawal from Lebanon. * Resolution 444: " . . . 'deplores' Israel's lack of cooperation with UN peacekeeping forces". * Resolution 446: " . . . 'determines' that Israeli settlements are a 'serious obstruction' to peace and calls on Israel to abide by the Fourth Geneva Convention". * Resolution 450: " . . . 'calls' on Israel to stop attacking Lebanon". * Resolution 452: " . . . 'calls' on Israel to cease building settlements in occupied territories". * Resolution 465: " . . . 'deplores' Israel's settlements and asks all member states not to buttist Israel's settlements program". * Resolution 467: " . . . 'strongly deplores' Israel's military intervention in Lebanon". * Resolution 468: " . . . 'calls' on Israel to rescind illegal expulsions of two Palestinian mayors and a judge and to facilitate their return". * Resolution 468 plus 1: " . . . 'strongly deplores' Israel's failure to observe the council's order not to deport Palestinians". * Resolution 471: " . . . 'expresses deep concern' at Israel's failure to abide by the Fourth Geneva Convention". * Resolution 476: " . . . 'reiterates' that Israel's claim to Jerusalem are 'null and void'". * Resolution 478: " . . . 'censures (Israel) in the strongest terms' for its claim to Jerusalem in its 'Basic Law'". * Resolution 484: " . . . 'declares it imperative' that Israel re- admit two deported Palestinian mayors". * Resolution 487: " . . . 'strongly condemns' Israel for its attack on Iraq's nuclear facility". * Resolution 497: " . . . 'decides' that Israel's annexation of Syria's Golan Heights is 'null and void' and demands that Israel rescinds its decision forthwith". * Resolution 498: " . . . 'calls' on Israel to withdraw from Lebanon". * Resolution 501: " . . . 'calls' on Israel to stop attacks against Lebanon and withdraw its troops". * Resolution 509: " . . . 'demands' that Israel withdraw its forces forthwith and unconditionally from Lebanon". * Resolution 515: " . . . 'demands' that Israel lift its siege of Beirut and allow food supplies to be brought in". * Resolution 517: " . . . 'censures' Israel for failing to obey UN resolutions and demands that Israel withdraw its forces from Lebanon". * Resolution 518: " . . . 'demands' that Israel cooperate fully with UN forces in Lebanon". * Resolution 520: " . . . 'condemns' Israel's attack into West Beirut". * Resolution 573: " . . . 'condemns' Israel 'vigorously' for planting Tunisia in attack on PLO headquarters. * Resolution 587: " . . . 'takes note' of previous calls on Israel to withdraw its forces from Lebanon and urges all parties to withdraw". * Resolution 592: " . . . 'strongly deplores' the killing of Palestinian students at Bir Zeit University by Israeli troops". * Resolution 605: " . . . 'strongly deplores' Israel's policies and practices denying the human rights of Palestinians. * Resolution 607: " . . . 'calls' on Israel not to deport Palestinians and strongly requests it to abide by the Fourth Geneva Convention. * Resolution 608: " . . . 'deeply regrets' that Israel has defied the United Nations and deported Palestinian civilians". * Resolution 636: " . . . 'deeply regrets' Israeli deportation of Palestinian civilians. * Resolution 641: " . . . 'deplores' Israel's continuing deportation of Palestinians. * Resolution 672: " . . . 'condemns' Israel for violence against Palestinians at the Haram al-Sharif-Temple Mount. * Resolution 673: " . . . 'deplores' Israel's refusal to cooperate with the United Nations. Resolution 681: " . . . 'deplores' Israel's resumption of the deportation of Palestinians. * Resolution 68 plus 14: " . . . 'deplores' Israel's deportation of Palestinians and calls on it to ensure their safe and immediate return. * Resolution 726: " . . . 'strongly condemns' Israel's deportation of Palestinians. * Resolution 799: ". . . 'strongly condemns' Israel's deportation of 413 Palestinians and calls for there immediate return. 1993 to 1995UNGA Res 50-21 - The Middle East Peace Process (Dec 12, 1995) UNGA Res 50-22 - The Situation in the Middle East (Dec 12, 1995) UNGA Res 49-35 - buttistance to Palestinian Refugees (Jan 30 1995) lUNGA Res 49-36 - Human Rights of Palestinian Refugees (Jan 30 1995) UNGA Res 49-62 - Question of Palestine (Feb 3 1995) UNGA Res 49-78 - Nuclear Proliferation in Mideast (Jan 11 1995) UNGA Res 49-87 - Situation in the Middle East (Feb 7 1995) UNGA Res 49-88 - The Middle East Peace Process (Feb 7 1995) UNGA Res 49-149- Palestinian Right- Self-Determination (Feb 7 1995) UNGA Res 48-213 - buttistance to Palestinian Refugees (Mar 15, 1994) UNGA Res 48-40 - UNRWA for Palestinian Refugees (Dec 13, 1993) UNGA Res 48-41 - Human Rights in the Territories (Dec 10 1993) UNGA Res 48-58 - The Middle East Peace Process (Dec 14 1993) UNGA Res 48-59 - The Situation in the Middle East (Dec 14 1993) UNGA Res 48-71 - Nuclear-Weapon-Free Zone in Mideast (Dec 16 1993) UNGA Res 48-78 - Israeli Nuclear Armament (Dec 16 1993) UNGA Res 48-94 - Self-Determination & Independence (Dec 20 1993) UNGA Res 48-124- Non-interference in Elections (Dec 20 1993) UNGA Res 48-158- Question of Palestine (Dec 20 1993) UNGA Res 48-212- Repercussions of Israeli Settlements (Dec 21 1993) ==========+++=========== U.S. Vetoes of UN Resolutions Critical of Israel (1972-2002) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- ----- ----- Vetoes: 1972-1982 Subject Date & Meeting US Rep Casting Veto Vote Palestine: Syrian-Lebanese Complaint. 3 power draft resolution 2-10784 9-10-1972 Bush 13-1, 1 Palestine: Examination of Middle East Situation. 8-power draft resolution (S-10974) 7-2-1973 Scali 13-1, 0 (China not partic.) Palestine: Egyptian-Lebanese Complaint. 5-power draft power resolution (S-11898) 12-8-1975 Moynihan 13-1, 1 Palestine: Middle East Problem, including Palestinian question. 6- power draft resolution (S-11940) 1-26-1976 Moynihan 9-1,3 (China & Libya not partic.) Palestine: Situation in Occupied Arab Territories. 5-power draft resolution (S-12022) 3-25-1976 Scranton 14-1,0 Palestine: Report on Committee on Rights of Palestinian People. 4- power draft resolution (S-121119) 6-29-1976 Sherer 10-1,4 Palestine: Palestinian Rights. Tunisian draft resolution. (S-13911) 4-30-1980 McHenry 10-1,4 Palestine: Golan Heights. Jordan draft resolution. (S-14832-Rev. 2) 1-20-1982 Kirkpatrick 9-1,5 Palestine: Situation in Occupied Territories, Jordan draft resolution (S-14943) 4-2-1982 Lichenstein 13-1,1 Palestine: Incident at the Dome of the Rock in Jerusalem. 4-power draft resolution 4-20-1982 Kirpatrick 14-1, 0 Palestine: Conflict in Lebanon. Spain draft resolution. (S-15185) 6-8-1982 Kirpatrick 14-1,0 Palestine: Conflict in Lebanon. France draft resolution. (S-15255-Rev. 2) 6-26-1982 Lichenstein 14-1 Palestine: Conflict in Lebanon. USSR draft resolution. (S-15347-Rev. 1, as orally amended) 8-6-1982 Lichenstein 11-1,3 Palestine: Situation in Occupied Territories, 20-power draft resolution (S-15895) 8-2-1983 Lichenstein 13-1,1 Security Council Vetoes-Negative voting 1983-present Subject Date Vote Occupied Arab Territories: Wholesale condemnation of Israeli settlement policies - not adopted 1983 S. Lebanon: Condemns Israeli action in southern Lebanon. S-16732 9-6-1984 Vetoed: 13-1 (U.S.), with 1 abstention (UK) Occupied Territories: Deplores "repressive measures" by Israel against Arab population. S-19459. 9-13-1985 Vetoed: 10-1 (U.S.), with 4 abstentions (Australia, Denmark, UK, France) Lebanon: Condemns Israeli practices against civilians in southern Lebanon. S-17000. 3-12-1985 Vetoed: 11-1 (U.S.), with 3 abstentions (Australia, Denmark, UK) Occupied Territories: Calls upon Israel to respect Muslim holy places. S-17768 plus 1-Rev. 1 1-30-1986 Vetoed: 13-1 (US), with one abstention (Thailand) Lebanon: Condemns Israeli practices against civilians in southern Lebanon. S-17730-Rev. 2. 1-17-1986 Vetoed: 11-1 (U.S.), with 3 abstentions (Australia, Denmark, UK) Libya-Israel: Condemns Israeli interception of Libyan plane. S-17796-Rev. 1. 2-6-1986 Vetoed: 10 -1 (US), with 4 abstentions (Australia, Denmark, France, UK) Lebanon: Draft strongly deplored repeated Israeli attacks against Lebanese territory and other measures and practices against the civilian population; (S-19434) 1-18-1988 vetoed 13-1 (US), with 1 abstention (UK) Lebanon: Draft condemned recent invasion by Israeli forces of Southern Lebanon and Draft condemned recent invasion by Israeli forces of Southern Lebanon and repeated a call for the immediate withdrawal of all Israeli forces from Lebanese territory; (S-19868) 5-10-1988 vetoed 14-1 (US) Lebanon: Draft strongly deplored the recent Israeli attack against Lebanese territory on 9 December 1988; (S-20322) 12-14-1988 vetoed 14-1 (US) Occupied territories: Draft called on Israel to accept de jure applicability of the 4th Geneva Convention; (S-19466) 1988 vetoed 14-1 (US) Occupied territories: Draft urged Israel to abide by the Fourth Geneva Convention, rescind the order to deport Palestinian civilians, and condemned policies and practices of Israel that violate the human rights of the Palestinian people in the occupied territories; (S-19780) 1988 vetoed 14-1 (US) Occupied territories: Strongly deplored Israeli policies and practices in the occupied territories, and strongly deplored also Israel's continued disregard of relevant Security Council decisions. 2-17-1989 Vetoed 14-1 (US) Occupied territories: Condemned Israeli policies and practices in the occupied territories. 6-9-1989 Vetoed 14-1 (US) Occupied territories: Deplored Israel's policies and practices in the occupied territories. 11-7-1989 Vetoed 14-1 (US) Occupied territories: NAM draft resolution to create a commission and send three security council members to Rishon Lezion, where an Israeli gunmen shot down seven Palestinian workers. 5-31-1990 Vetoed 14-1 (US) Middle East: Confirms that the expropriation of land by Israel in East Jerusalem is invalid and in violation of relevant Security Council resolutions and provisions of the Fourth Geneva convention; expresses support of peace process, including the Declaration of Principles of 9-13-1993 5-17-1995 Vetoed 14-1 (US) Middle East: Calls upon Israeli authorities to refrain from all actions or measures, including settlement activities. 3-7-1997 Vetoed 14-1 (US) Middle East: Demands that Israel cease construction of the settlement in east Jerusalem (called Jabal Abu Ghneim by the Palestinians and Har Homa by Israel), as well as all the other Israeli settlement activity in the occupied territories 3-21-1997 Vetoed 13-1,1 (US) Call for UN Observers Force in West Bank, Gaza 3-27-2001 Vetoed 9-1 (US), with four abstentions (Britain, France, Ireland and Norway) Condemned acts of terror, demanded an end to violence and the establishment of a monitoring mechanism to bring in observers. 12-15-2001 Vetoed 12-1 (US) with two abstentions (Britain and Norway) Source: U.S. State Department
WAR CRIMES
Israel accused Friday, 3 November, 2000 - Israel has always sought to escape responsibility for what was done in Khiam OPENING GRAVE WOUNDS EVIDENCE OF ISRAELI ATROCITIES DURING THE 1967 WAR WITH EGYPT THREATENS THE COUNTRIES' FRAGILE TIES FREDERICK PAINTON REPORTED BY AMANY RADWAN-CAIRO AND ERIC SILVER-JERUSALEM - The fury aroused in Egypt by the apparent proof of mbuttacres was fueled by the press, which matched wartime photos with imaginative illustrations showing Egyptian soldiers surrendering, being ordered to dig their graves, then being executed.
"The saving of the Jews in Europe did not figure at the head of the list of priorities of the ruling clbutt. It was the foundation of the State which was primordial in their eyes." raeli-politics-part3.htm
"The mbuttes of Jews from Hungary's ghettos obediently boarded the deportation trains without knowing their fate. They were full of confidence in the false information that they were being transferred to Kenyermeze.
The Nazis could not have misled the mbuttes of Jews so conclusively had they not spread their false information through Jewish channels.
The Jews of the ghettos would not have trusted the Nazi or Hungarian rulers. But they had trust in their Jewish leaders. Eichmann and others used this known fact as part of their calculated plan to mislead the Jews. They were able to deport the Jews to their extermination by the help of Jewish leaders.
The false information was spread by the Jewish leaders. The local leaders of the Jews of Kluj and Nodvarod knew that other leaders were spreading such false information and did not protest.
Those of the Jews who tried to warn their friends of the truth were persecuted by the Jewish leaders in charge of the local 'rescue work'.
The truth is that somewhere between 700,000 and 1,500,000 people died in German work camps in 1944 and 1945. Most of them were Jews. Many were not. Most of them died in the last six months of the war from disease and hunger caused by America's planting of Germany and subsequent destruction of her infrastructure. There were some atrocities but very few. Few people realize that the International Red Cross had a field office in Auschwiz from 1942 until the end of the war. That office never reported or recorded any atrocities (Several years ago international Jewry forced the Red Cross to apologize to the Jews - apologize for not seeing something that never happened.)
Clearly, the German authorities were at pains to relieve the dire situation as far as they were able. The Red Cross are quite explicit in stating that food supplies ceased at this time due to the Allied planting of German transportation, and in the interests of interned Jews they had protested on March 15th, 1944 against "the barbarous aerial warfare of the Allies" (Inter Arma Caritas, p. 78). By October 2nd, 1944, the ICRC warned the German Foreign Office of the impending collapse of the German transportation system, declaring that starvation conditions for people throughout Germany were becoming inevitable.
Israel Judge Promotes Her Court As a Model Strike Breaking STRIKE BREAKING (AS REPORTED BY NYT AND OTHER AMERICAN PAPERS) THE JERUSALEM POST CORRESPONDENT HIRSH GOODMAN - they have not received any person training, nor are they members of a person organization. Rather they are members of that Palestinian generation that grew up knowing nothing but occupation
With anger, hatred, and sheer ferocity, thousands of youngsters hurled rocks at their Israeli occupiers, undaunted by the gunfire that greeted them. This was more than civil unrest. ...It was the beginning of a civil rebellion - Dan Fisher, Los Angeles Times, December 20, 1987. On that day, - wrote John Kifner in The New York Times, - the vast army of Arab laborers who wait on tables, pick vegetables, haul garbage, lay brick and perform virtually all Israel's menial work, stayed home.: John Kifner, New York Times, December 22, 1987.
The Israeli response to the uprising was brutal. Defense Minister Yitzhak Rabin ordered the use of tanks, armored vehicles and automatic rifles against an unarmed population.
The San Francisco Examiner cited Rabin as openly advocating buttbuttination. "They can shoot to hit leaders of disorder," Rabin said in defense of the army's practice of using marksmen with high-powered .22-caliber rifles to shoot indiscriminately at Palestinian youth. - San Francisco Examiner, December 23, 1987.
Rabin ordered house-to-house searches, first for young men and later for anyone of whom an example might be made. By December 27, over 2,500 Palestinians were seized, many of them as young as twelve; by the end of January the number reached 4,000 and was rising. The "militants "were marked for deportation. Israeli high-security jails and detention centers were overflowing. Mbutt trials of Palestinians were underway.
The act of brutality which most inflamed the Palestinian population was the army seizure of the wounded from hospital beds. This practice, standard procedure throughout the invasion of Lebanon in 1982, made Shifa Hospital in Gaza a center of resistance. Great crowds ambutted to defend the wounded, whom, they rightfully feared, would never be seen again.
A mother of a Palestinian man shot three times in the head by Israeli soldiers was asked if she would let her remaining sons join the demonstrations. " As long as I am alive, "she responded, "I am going to teach the young people to fight ... I don't care whatever happens, as long as we get our land." - John Kifner, New York Times, December 21, 1987.
"They entered the house like animals, shouting," the 22-year old student at Bir Zeit University said. "They took us from the house, kicking us in the head, beating us, all the soldiers with their rifle butts."Two others, he said, beat his hands with lengths of two-by-fours, breaking the bones.
The first priority is to use force, might, beatings. This is considered more effective than detention ... because he may then resume stoning soldiers. But if troops break his hand, he won't be able to throw stones. - New York Times, January 21, 1988.
North Korea Does Nuclear Test 6401pete is indignant: Is "everyone" your second given name? You should have said instead that you love the US. You love their politics, their politicians and their way of life. You love them sooo much...
North Korea Does Nuclear Test 6400jg Do the US need a reason to attack another country, beyond playing to the galleries of people wanting to feel patriotic at home? They attacked Grenada some years ago so they could get...
AGAINST AN UNARMED CIVILIAN POPULATION.
No matter which house one calls, the anguished accounts of family members wounded or arrested pour forth. Convoys of buses cruise the streets of Nablus followed by vans of the Mossad, Israel's secret police. Army units go from house to house pulling youths from their beds at 3 a.m. As the buses fill, the soldiers beat the youths viciously around the head, shins, groin and back. Shrieks fill the air.
AGAINST AN UNARMED CIVILIAN POPULATION.
By April 1988 over 150 Palestinians had died. The Israeli government had admitted to the arrest of 2,000 people, bringing the acknowledged total to 4,000. The real figure was far higher.
Sources in the West Bank and Gaza established that the number detained by the weekend of March 27 had exceeded 13,000. Bbuttam Shaka'a, deposed Mayor of Nablus, placed the total held solely in a hastily constructed barbed-wire encampment at Dhariyah at 10,000.
And under these conditions people have no chance of being molested? Children and parents would complain loudly about paedophilia, rape, forced incest, sadistic and perverted against them? Of course and the church, there are christians in this crowd that your jewish brothers dont like to talk about, did the church race to check the wellbeing of there followers, were they even allowed? God would approve according to the Christian Evangelical Church-s led by G.Bush and our other Christian insbreastutions?
TWO OF THE CHILDREN, AGES 9 AND 11 , WERE TAKEN BY THE SOLDIERS IN THEIR night clothes, frog-marched in the streets and beaten as they were forced by the jeering soldiers to clear debris.
In the Balata camp outside Nablus, and in the Casbah - the old quarter - l, 000 people were arrested in a period of 48 hours. The discovery of people in ditches in the fields - shot in the back or with their heads caved in - has been reported from villages throughout the West Bank and Gaza
NEW YORK TIMES Fleets of helicopters fly over Nablus at night dropping a dense, green toxic gas over the city. The smell pervades every house. Armed units fire canisters of the substance into houses at random. Doctors at Ittihad Hospital reported several rests and severe lung injuries from this as-yet unidentified asphyxiating chemical, totally distinct from tear gas.
Among the victims was the grandmother of the Da'as family and the 100-year-old father of noted Nablus attorney Mohammad Irshaid. Soldiers had entered the house at 2 a.m., smashing furniture and firing a canister of the dreaded green gas while preventing the family from leaving.
Simultaneously, the Israeli army targeted the hospitals. Army trucks rammed ambulances and blocked them from reaching the homes of those overcome by the gas. Soldiers entered the Ittihad Hospital in Nablus numerous times, arresting the wounded and those waiting to give blood to family members. EVEN THE OPERATING THEATRE WAS INVADED WHILE SURGEONS WERE OPERATING ON PATIENTS.
DOCTORS WERE BEATEN AND EQUIPMENT SMASHED. FAMILY MEMBERS WERE PREVENTED FROM ENTERING THE HOSPITAL AND THE CARS OF DOCTORS AND NURSES WERE DESTROYED BY SOLDIERS.
Meanwhile, all of Nablus was paralysed by a total strike. All the streets in every quarter of the city were without open shops or business activity. As gas permeated the city, cries and chants filled the night.
Gas canisters recovered by Bbuttam Shaka'a, Yousef al-Masri chief of Ittihad Hospital and American author Alfred Lilienthal bear the markings "560 cs. Federal Lab. Saltsburg, Pa. USA MK2 1988." Biochemists are studying their properties as casualties mount.
JOHN KIFNER reported on April 4 that "Hundreds of refugees were treated in United Nations clinics for gas inhalation." On April 15, Kifner wrote, "...gas has been thrown inside homes, clinics and schools where the effects are particularly severe."
Check Number of prisoners in Auschwitz.
CROSSES AT AUSCHWITZ
Historian--Jews consistently call for the removal of Christian symbols from Auschwitz even though statistics at Auschwitz demonstrate that at least 80% of the labor at that work camp were non-Jews--e.g., Christians and Moslems--yet the Jews are only interested in Jewish-oriented rests and not in the others. Very few persons who survived Auschwitz discuss the gbutting of Jews or others there, except for the Jews who were interrogated for the Nuremberg Show Trial in 1947. In addition, the Red Cross was on-site at Auschwitz for all three years in question and reported no gbuttings at all occuring. This is embarrbutting to the Simon Wiesenthal Center. At Nuremberg, the figure of 4.5 million Jews gbutted at Auschwitz was offered based not on facts but on a mathematical formula--e.g., if the ovens worked full time 24 hours per day, 4.5 million could have been consumed, and, therefore, we know it happened. This was a specious argument, and recently the real figures of rests at Auschwitz were released in Moscow to the chagrin of the ADL and Wiesenthal Trotskyite Factionalists. In addition, the same types of testimony given by Jews about Germans gbutting people at the work camps were given by Polish testimonials concerning the Germans lining up the Polish officers at Katyn Forest and killing them; however, no German EVER end a Polish Officer at Katyn, because the Russians (who took testimonies for BOTH Katyn Forest and Auschwitz for use at Nuremberg) admitted killing all of the Polish Officers at the Katyn Forest. So, since probable lies were admitted as testimony concerning the Katyn Forest Mbuttacre of 40,000 Poles by Germans when all along the Russians knew Russian Jews did this, then all of the testimony at Nuremberg is called into question, because all of it came from Russian interrogators who let those testifying know that there were certain things they wanted to hear or else. Rudolf Hess and others were tortured to make them submit "properly approved" testimony at Nuremberg.
. In his 1983 book, Zionism in the Age of the Dictators, Lenni Brenner shows that 20th century Zionists observed shockingly few limits to that expediency. Not surprisingly, the book received little coverage in the American media. 83155
51 Documents also sheds a whole new light on the term Holocaust guilt, frequently understood to mean Western, non-Jewish guilt for not acting against the Holocaust earlier. However, these documents make it clear that Holocaust guilt began with those Zionists who made the undoubtedly difficult, but politically expedient choice to place Eretz-Israel at the top of their priorities, above the lives of their threatened European brethren.
From a Zionist Executive Meeting speech by Yitzhak Gruenbaum on Feb.18, 1943:
Without Jewish co operation through the zionists the Germans would never have had the resources to herd the Jews into the various camps. And the zionists made it impossible for the underground to trust the jews. Like elsewhere, the only people who had the information and the ear of the frightened Jewish population were the Judenrat. In this case the Judenrat comprised mainly the Zionist Federation members. Without their help the SS, with 19 officers and less than 90 men, plus a few hundred Hungarian police, could not have collected and controlled a million Jews, when they did not even know their whereabouts.
Is The same authors also describe co-operation between Zionist leaders and Eichmann. It is interesting to note that the extreme right-wing revisionists only chose wealthy Jews for emigration, whereas other Zionists insisted on taking only young and healthy Jews. Eichmann helped them to carry out these plans, in return for which the Zionist Organization paid large sums to the Nazis. As Kimche says about the Zionist delegates in Germany: They had not come to Germany to save Jews. That was not their job. When the Nazis began the systematic liquidate of Jews in 1941, the Zionists decided neither to support Jewish resistance in Europe, nor to attack the Nazis, nor to say anything about the mbutt liquidation of their fellow Jews. Their sole purpose was to save certain selected Jews as future settlers in Palestine. They were not interested in Jews who wished to stay in their home countries and fight the Nazis.
SO THAT IS WHY SO MANY DIED - PERHAPS CHILDREN AND OLDER PEOPLE JUST WERENT AS ROBUST ? AND IN ANY CASE WHATEVER NAZIS SAID DID NOT SHIFT THE ZIONIST VISION OF ONLY HEALTHY BODIES.
