qThe_key_to_the_GATES_OF_EDEN_=3F__=A9The key to the GATES OF EDEN ? © A somewhat unbelievable story that if proven true, would not only prove the story of Genesis true, but also the reality that the devil deceived...
The way we wereThis is so true! Oh' for the old days. To the Kids Who Survived the '30s...
Many feminists argue that prohitibition of prosbreastution and polygamy protect women's right.
What right is protected by prohibiting consensual offers from males?
What about women that want several husband? What about women that would rather share a handsome, smart, rich male than be the only one for a poor dumb violent one?
How many females got beaten up by violent dumb males because those females do not have enough loving billionares playboy to pick?
What about women's right to rent her womb or **** to the highest bidder? What about women's right to choose any rich males that want to have love with her for money?
Without prohibition of consensual acts, women that got beaten up just once by a boyfriend, can say, "f*** it I am done", and quickly choose to become a misress for a loving rich male. No need to count on cops or anything. Those violent bastard were lucky if they got chosen in the first place.
In many countries where genital multilation is common, The more a male doesn't have positive intensive to mate with females, the more likely the male would, out of jealousy, use negative intensives to keep women in line.
In many countries, women face genital mutilation, burned alive, etc. Without prohibition of prosbreastution, women can quickly go to males that can resort to positive intensives, like money, to persuade females, rather than negative intensives motivated by jealousy.
Without regulation against consensual acts, women also have more choices to earn quick money and become financially independent by performing in strip clubs, selling virginity, etc.
Also, I believe the true purpose of anti prosbreastution, anti polygamy, and child support law is to take away choices from females. It's there to ration females to less desirable poorer financially irresponsible males.
I am not against women being financially independent. 50% of females are smarter than 50% of males. So yes, women can be anything they want too. Engineer, astronout, boxer, nude boxer, etc. However, women will be better of even further if they can take advantage of monetary consensual offers from males.
Christian would love this too. When prosbreastution is allowed, women can say, I'll bear a baby for $1 million. Now, which women would abort their baby if good rich daddy will pay her $1 million for delivering his.
Not just money. The rich often carry better genes. Women are more likely to abort their baby when the quality of the sperm that knock her up is low. If a woman have a potentially genius baby, why abort it?
It's a win win solution. The only person that got anything to lose is the less desirable poor males. Ugly feminists that are jealous of what pretty women can achieve might also disagree, but even they can aim "higher" without love regulation. But f*** them. Women can vote too right? Vote for freedom. Vote for women choice! Vote libertarian solutions.
"Know the truth, the truth will set you free" - Jesus. "...But before it does, it will make you angry." -Jerry Joiner Bob
