To Shep: once again, the reaction I expected. A deliberate misrepresentation. I'm not going to dance while you pull the strings, buckeroo. I've already told you what I'll do when you do your bit.
Well, I could respond by saying you are just admitting by that comment you don't have a clue what the term means, but I'll try to avoid playing your game. I have already explained, in detail, in several postings what I believe it to be. I am happy once again to reiterate if you don't have the ability to check it for yourself from those postings. I am a supporter of what I believe multiculturalism to be, certainly, but I have found people are working on spectacularly different definitions of the term. So you show me yours and I'll show you mine.
As it turns out, Fasnagh posted official versions of the answer that a Canberra bureaucrat has turned into neat officialese and while I would have put some of them differently, you might look over them as they seriously represent the upside of multiculturalism. I thank him for doing that. If you are not prepared to do that then you are wasting my time. How do you react to those excepts from the government website? They're a useful starting point for discussion. Comment on those and we'll go on from there. No point reinventing the wheel.
Exactly. That's why I asked. Hey Hunter, I'm starting to think it's dangerous to make a joke in these postings - they go straight over the heads of some people. Mickey Wallace actually seems to have believed I thought you needed help with a posting to him because I made a joke about it! Whooosh!!
Oh well.
Rifty
-- Academic and Computing Help