Your continued commentary lacks accountability for the character and statistically meager reality of your earlier statements--the truer value was expressed by you as "it means nothing".
My initial statement said nothing of "dictionary and thesaurus", it was simply an implied claim that linguistically they deploy a richer set of phomemes as dialectical buttociations: "that German speakers are capable of larger words than Australian posters seem to."
Whether this is due to English itself being derived from Anglo-Frisian (ie. my cultural group) and German isn't known to me. Does language determine, constrain or limit development as progression in thinking and consciousness?
It seems you are being elitist again by claiming my statement stupid or lacking intellectual development. If anything, I thought 'imperial clbutticism' a pithy epigram.
- dolf
words"
How's this:
Any German who has access to a dictionary and thesaurus, and has the ability to use it, should generally be able to write larger words than most Australians who have access to neither.
I have no idea how you can deny being obtuse in your statement - I would have thought that the oppression of imperial clbutticism was right up your alley.
Cheers Artie
niemand
