On Thu, 26 May 2005 11:30:43 +1000, peter
Only because she wasn't permitted to have evidence for the defence. The Indonesian authorities and courts refused to fingerprint the large, transparent, plastic bag of dope found in her luggage.
Even the Chief of police in Bali has raised concerns about this.
There is the lingering question of why she would do it. Can you explain why someone would take 60k worth of dope IN to Bali, where it's only worth a quarter of it's value in Brisbane? Well...
We know for a fact that Sydney baggage handler tamper wantonly with people's luggage.
We also know for a fact that there is a drug ring among just ONE group of Sydney baggage handlers. And we know for a fact that it's NOT the first time we've discovered this at Sydney airport.
I think you are projecting.
Sure there are some stupid people watching the tele, who conclude that she MUST be innocent because of all the hype.
You watch the tele and conclude that she MUST be guilty because of all the hype, without having looked at the facts.
Same deal.
snip
-- A: Top posters Q: What's the most annoying thing on usenet
#politics irc.austnet.org (the aussie politics channel!) #politicalforum irc.undernet.org
"Conservatives are not necessarily stupid, but most stupid people are conservatives." - John Stuart Mill
