I would agree but I wouild add a few other factors. "Values" have become "commoditised". The morality and profit based motives of the market has entered human morality: it has become our morality. Thus by these standards if a migrant can be shown to be more cost effective than a child then the whole economy will tend shift to expoit this more efficient resource. Thats is what the 'market' has determined.
Douglas Woods possibly executedFran Hehe you may eventually find things like that on the English version of the site (tho I doubt it, it'd kinda ruin their image in the eyes of the kaffir), but...
Of course this market morality bypbuttes the core purpose of the human being: to reproduce and bequeeth a legacy of children to the future and that the purpose of 'money' is only to facilitate this. Thus we create a situation where we force women into the workforce to pay the high housing prices and mortgages that themselves are created by the huge influx of immigrants. We pay taxes to endless expand infrastructure for the new arrivals and we endure water rationing and traffic jams. In doing so we reduce the birth rate as we are forced to give up child rearing in favour of work to pay for it all.
This market based morality; I would call it the extension of managerialism into culture commoditises the western peoples and it has found us too expensive compared to migration.
Compounding this is that the core traditional values that once protected us against this: the church, nationalism ,pride and confidence in our culture and history have all been eroded if not visciously destroyed by not only mangerialism but the political correctness of the left, the ideals of ethno-marxism, ethnic lobby groups and the hostillity of multiculturalism to ethnic homogenity of Europeans.
You will also find that immigration creates a fictional 'growth'. in reality the growth is in overall GDP not in per capita GDP. (Most analysis says that population gorwth REDUCES our standard of living even if monetarily it improves) However large companies, wealthy individuals etc postioned to take advantage of this 'surf the wave' of population growth. Understandibly they set up vocal lobby groups (eg the Australian confederation of Industy) to keep the good times going. It also helps keep the unions in check.
In reality true economic growth requires pure improvements in knowledge and technology that have virtually nothing to do with population size.
In fact cheap labour creates a lazy, cheap labour focused managment that doesn't and probably can't anymore focus on automation and new techniques or technology to improve productivity. I believe they actually loose the abillity to to this and become focused entirely on short term cost reductions.